Lukas Rosol vs Borna Gojo — Forli 3 CH Round of 16

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Rosol L.
6-4 6-7 6-4
Gojo B.
Rosol L.
66462
Gojo B.
47741

Lukas Rosol defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 6-7 6-4 in the Forli 3 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
95
Break points won·Slight edge
3
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
70
Tiebreaks·Even
73
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gojo B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Halys Q.[2]
7-56-756-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[2]
Stebe C.
6-766-26-4
Kotov P.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Agamenone F.
7-57-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-636-717-5
Kotov P.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Halys Q.[2]
Moroni G.
7-617-62
R16
Moroni G.
Wu T.
7-686-3
Agamenone F.
Uchida K.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Clarke J.
6-36-3
Kotov P.
Masur D.[7]
6-26-0
Ferreira Silva F.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-657-65
Halys Q.[2]
Guinard M.
5-76-16-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Gojo B.
6-46-746-4
R32
Guinard M.
Tiurnev E.
6-756-46-3
Wu T.
Zuk K.[6]
4-66-37-5
Uchida K.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-34-67-64
Stebe C.
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
6-46-746-2
Masur D.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-633-66-4
Kotov P.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Draper J.
7-636-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-662-67-62
Agamenone F.
Copil M.
6-23-66-3
Moroni G.
Hoang A.
6-746-06-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Rosol L.
Ilkel C.[3]
6-47-67
Pellegrino A.
Lacko L.[8]
0-66-37-60
Halys Q.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-1