Pedro Sakamoto vs Quentin Folliot — Concepcion CH Round of 16
Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
clay
Sakamoto P.6-4 6-3
Folliot Q.
Sakamoto P.
662
Folliot Q.
430
Pedro Sakamoto defeated Quentin Folliot 6-4 6-3 in the Concepcion CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Pedro Sakamoto came in defending last year's round of 16.
Key context
- Match story: Pedro Sakamoto closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Sakamoto P.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
63%
46%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
52%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
47%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (141 vs 5). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.3
Surface form0.0
Win streakFatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d8.3
7.0
3-set count8.0
Prev. match8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
94
—
Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Galan D.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-42-67-63
Etcheverry T.[3]
Olivo R.
2-66-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-37-61
Galan D.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-16-2
Dellien H.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Mena F.[6]
6-12-66-2
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[2]
7-622-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Tirante T.
6-06-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
7-694-67-5
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-23-66-1
R16
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Rubin N.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Folliot Q.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Villanueva G.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Mena F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-37-65
Olivo R.
Mena F.[8]
6-36-1
Tirante T.
Furness E.
7-646-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Diez S.
6-16-2
Varillas J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jarry N.[4]
6-43-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Lama G.
6-37-61
Dellien H.[1]
Jubb P.
6-12-0
R32
Rodriguez C.
Burruchaga R.
W/O
Villanueva G.
Martin A.[2]
6-26-3
Franco Descotte M.
Hernandez F.
6-06-0
Alvarez N.
Hidalgo D.
4-67-656-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-2
Sakamoto P.
Olivo R.[5]
6-16-1
Kirchheimer S.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Cerundolo F.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-3
Dellien H.[1]
Castro C.
6-06-1
Lama G.
Vernier M.
6-26-2
Mena F.[6]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-34-66-4
Galan D.[3]
Merino A.
6-06-1
Rubin N.
Nunez V.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Achondo G.
6-06-0
Dellien H.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-0
Tirante T.
Nunez D.
7-656-3
Varillas J.[2]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-624-66-3
Lama G.
Bueno G.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Torres J.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Juarez F.
3-67-56-3
Jarry N.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Furness E.
Kopriva V.[6]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
1-67-606-2
Denolly C.
Oliveira G.
6-06-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-15-76-2
Collarini A.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Melzer G.
3-66-37-5
Mena F.[8]
Casanova H.
6-10-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Cachin P.
6-33-1