Borna Gojo vs Jack Draper — Forli 3 CH Round of 32

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Gojo B.
7-6 6-3
Draper J.
Gojo B.
7762
Draper J.
6330

Borna Gojo defeated Jack Draper 7-6 6-3 in the Forli 3 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
67%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
10.5
8.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
88
Break points saved·Even
95
99
Break points won·Dominant
10
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Draper J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.3Hard Elo 1662
Surface ELO
7.7+121 Hard Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
8.4
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Draper J.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Halys Q.[2]
7-56-756-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[2]
Stebe C.
6-766-26-4
Kotov P.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Agamenone F.
7-57-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-636-717-5
Kotov P.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Halys Q.[2]
Moroni G.
7-617-62
R16
Moroni G.
Wu T.
7-686-3
Agamenone F.
Uchida K.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Clarke J.
6-36-3
Kotov P.
Masur D.[7]
6-26-0
Ferreira Silva F.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-657-65
Halys Q.[2]
Guinard M.
5-76-16-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Gojo B.
6-46-746-4
R32
Guinard M.
Tiurnev E.
6-756-46-3
Wu T.
Zuk K.[6]
4-66-37-5
Uchida K.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-34-67-64
Stebe C.
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
6-46-746-2
Masur D.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-633-66-4
Kotov P.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Draper J.
7-636-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-662-67-62
Agamenone F.
Copil M.
6-23-66-3
Moroni G.
Hoang A.
6-746-06-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Rosol L.
Ilkel C.[3]
6-47-67
Pellegrino A.
Lacko L.[8]
0-66-37-60
Halys Q.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-1