Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Flavio CobolliAustralian Open Qualifying Final

Australian Open · ATP · Qualifying Final
#30ATP
1812ELO
1766Hard ELO
$1.4MYTD
$6.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
#9ATP
1896ELO
1810Hard ELO
$3.1MYTD
$8.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Etcheverry T.
6-3 6-2
Cobolli F.
Etcheverry T.
662
Cobolli F.
320

Tomas Martin Etcheverry defeated Flavio Cobolli 6-3 6-2 in the Australian Open qualifying final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Flavio Cobolli came in ranked #9. Tomas Martin Etcheverry extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

11
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-18HamburgSFclayFlavio Cobolli2-6 7-5 6-4
2025-01-13Australian OpenR128hardTomas Martin Etcheverry6-7(8) 6-3 7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Etcheverry T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Cobolli F.

Cobolli F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Etcheverry T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Etcheverry T.Cobolli F.
51
Serve
20
35
Return
35

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
76
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Even
36
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
87
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1766
Surface ELO
5.2+44 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1812
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1896
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
95
66

Etcheverry T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Cobolli F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 63 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 68%
Q1
Dzumhur D.[30]
Tu L.
6-16-3
Trungelliti M.
Lacko L.
6-36-4
Tabilo A.[16]
Mccabe J.
7-653-66-3
Lehecka J.[18]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.[15]
Kicker N.
6-45-76-2
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
3-66-16-4
Couacaud E.
Ilkel C.[21]
6-36-746-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Sela D.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Olivo R.
Fratangelo B.
6-26-4
Winter E.
Simon G.[4]
6-31-66-3
Elias G.
Gulbis E.
6-756-23-1
Machac T.[20]
Ugo Carabelli C.
2-66-36-1
Ficovich J.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Celikbilek A.[32]
6-46-4
Halys Q.[26]
Mayot H.
6-46-1
Kamke T.
Gaio F.[28]
6-46-2
Broady L.[10]
Zuk K.
4-66-16-2
Sousa J.[17]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[19]
Collarini A.
7-676-2
Rodionov J.[14]
Janvier M.
7-636-4
Cobolli F.
Harris A.
7-634-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Seyboth Wild T.[13]
6-777-53-1
Bhambri Y.
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[31]
Schoolkate T.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Blanch U.
6-16-2
Kopriva V.
Agamenone F.
4-67-636-3
De Jong J.
Santillan A.
5-76-46-3
Sweeny D.
Barrere G.
7-56-3
Popko D.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
6-17-5
Skatov T.
Grenier H.[25]
6-36-2
Cachin P.
Cerundolo F.[9]
6-756-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Mena F.
6-46-3
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Jung J.
6-757-56-0
Barrios Vera T.[22]
Muller A.
6-37-5
Giannessi A.
Huesler M.
6-43-66-3
Etcheverry T.[12]
Coppejans K.
2-66-46-1
Polmans M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-636-2
Lestienne C.
Pellegrino A.
2-66-16-2
Stricker D.
Safwat M.
3-66-26-1
Hijikata R.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Gombos N.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-746-2
Gomez E.[23]
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Torpegaard M.
1-0
Moroni G.
Ramanathan R.
6-37-5
Caruso S.[29]
Rola B.
3-66-17-65
Sachko V.
Bergs Z.
3-67-652-3
Daniel T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Ebden M.
Moraing M.[27]
4-66-26-1
Purcell M.
Donskoy E.
6-46-2
Safiullin R.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.
Basic M.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Tirante T.
Schnur B.
6-41-66-4
Albot R.[5]
Baldi F.
7-666-2
Wolf J.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-4
Vavassori A.
Bemelmans R.
6-27-66
Kubler J.
Giustino L.
3-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Kovalik J.[24]
7-636-2
Varillas J.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
7-57-66
Haase R.
Martin A.[1]
6-04-67-5
Watanuki Y.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Kuzmanov D.
Masur D.
4-66-37-65