Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Noah Rubin — Concepcion CH Round of 16

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG7
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
clay
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-2 6-2
Rubin N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Rubin N.
220

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Noah Rubin 6-2 6-2 in the Concepcion CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Rubin N.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
80
Break points won·Dominant
62
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
54
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rubin N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
3.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Rubin N.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
6-13-66-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Galan D.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-42-67-63
Etcheverry T.[3]
Olivo R.
2-66-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-37-61
Galan D.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-16-2
Dellien H.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Mena F.[6]
6-12-66-2
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[2]
7-622-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Tirante T.
6-06-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
7-694-67-5
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-23-66-1
R16
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Rubin N.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Folliot Q.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Villanueva G.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Mena F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-37-65
Olivo R.
Mena F.[8]
6-36-1
Tirante T.
Furness E.
7-646-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Diez S.
6-16-2
Varillas J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jarry N.[4]
6-43-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Lama G.
6-37-61
Dellien H.[1]
Jubb P.
6-12-0
R32
Rodriguez C.
Burruchaga R.
W/O
Villanueva G.
Martin A.[2]
6-26-3
Franco Descotte M.
Hernandez F.
6-06-0
Alvarez N.
Hidalgo D.
4-67-656-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-2
Sakamoto P.
Olivo R.[5]
6-16-1
Kirchheimer S.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Cerundolo F.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-3
Dellien H.[1]
Castro C.
6-06-1
Lama G.
Vernier M.
6-26-2
Mena F.[6]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-34-66-4
Galan D.[3]
Merino A.
6-06-1
Rubin N.
Nunez V.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Achondo G.
6-06-0
Dellien H.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-0
Tirante T.
Nunez D.
7-656-3
Varillas J.[2]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-624-66-3
Lama G.
Bueno G.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Torres J.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Juarez F.
3-67-56-3
Jarry N.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Furness E.
Kopriva V.[6]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
1-67-606-2
Denolly C.
Oliveira G.
6-06-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-15-76-2
Collarini A.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Melzer G.
3-66-37-5
Mena F.[8]
Casanova H.
6-10-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Cachin P.
6-33-1