Tomas Machac vs Camilo Ugo CarabelliAustralian Open Qualifying Round 1

Australian Open · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
#59ATP
1759ELO
1642Hard ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
Machac T.
2-6 6-3 6-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Machac T.
2662
Ugo Carabelli C.
6311

Tomas Machac defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli 2-6 6-3 6-1 in the Australian Open qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #49, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Ugo Carabelli C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Ugo Carabelli C.
30
Serve
0
25
Return
5

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
90
78
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
90
Break points won·Clear edge
80
62
Deciding sets·Even
94
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+188 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1642
6.2Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1759
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.3
Surface form
5.2
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
96

Ugo Carabelli C.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 68%
Q1
Dzumhur D.[30]
Tu L.
6-16-3
Trungelliti M.
Lacko L.
6-36-4
Tabilo A.[16]
Mccabe J.
7-653-66-3
Lehecka J.[18]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.[15]
Kicker N.
6-45-76-2
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
3-66-16-4
Couacaud E.
Ilkel C.[21]
6-36-746-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Sela D.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Olivo R.
Fratangelo B.
6-26-4
Winter E.
Simon G.[4]
6-31-66-3
Elias G.
Gulbis E.
6-756-23-1
Machac T.[20]
Ugo Carabelli C.
2-66-36-1
Ficovich J.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Celikbilek A.[32]
6-46-4
Halys Q.[26]
Mayot H.
6-46-1
Kamke T.
Gaio F.[28]
6-46-2
Broady L.[10]
Zuk K.
4-66-16-2
Sousa J.[17]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[19]
Collarini A.
7-676-2
Rodionov J.[14]
Janvier M.
7-636-4
Cobolli F.
Harris A.
7-634-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Seyboth Wild T.[13]
6-777-53-1
Bhambri Y.
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[31]
Schoolkate T.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Blanch U.
6-16-2
Kopriva V.
Agamenone F.
4-67-636-3
De Jong J.
Santillan A.
5-76-46-3
Sweeny D.
Barrere G.
7-56-3
Popko D.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
6-17-5
Skatov T.
Grenier H.[25]
6-36-2
Cachin P.
Cerundolo F.[9]
6-756-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Mena F.
6-46-3
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Jung J.
6-757-56-0
Barrios Vera T.[22]
Muller A.
6-37-5
Giannessi A.
Huesler M.
6-43-66-3
Etcheverry T.[12]
Coppejans K.
2-66-46-1
Polmans M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-636-2
Lestienne C.
Pellegrino A.
2-66-16-2
Stricker D.
Safwat M.
3-66-26-1
Hijikata R.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Gombos N.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-746-2
Gomez E.[23]
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Torpegaard M.
1-0
Moroni G.
Ramanathan R.
6-37-5
Caruso S.[29]
Rola B.
3-66-17-65
Sachko V.
Bergs Z.
3-67-652-3
Daniel T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Ebden M.
Moraing M.[27]
4-66-26-1
Purcell M.
Donskoy E.
6-46-2
Safiullin R.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.
Basic M.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Tirante T.
Schnur B.
6-41-66-4
Albot R.[5]
Baldi F.
7-666-2
Wolf J.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-4
Vavassori A.
Bemelmans R.
6-27-66
Kubler J.
Giustino L.
3-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Kovalik J.[24]
7-636-2
Varillas J.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
7-57-66
Haase R.
Martin A.[1]
6-04-67-5
Watanuki Y.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Kuzmanov D.
Masur D.
4-66-37-65