Matheus Amorim De Lima vs Mats Rosenkranz — Blumenau CH Round of 32

Blumenau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BRA
Matheus Amorim De Lima
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
clay
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1320Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
De Lima M.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Rosenkranz M.
De Lima M.
6162
Rosenkranz M.
3631

Matheus Amorim De Lima defeated Mats Rosenkranz 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Blumenau CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Lima M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Rosenkranz M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs De Lima M.

Serve advantage — Rosenkranz M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
De Lima M.Rosenkranz M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
60%
1st serve points won·Dominant
41%
76%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
33%
49%
Service points won·Dominant
38%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
24%
35%
Break points saved·Dominant
39%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.0
8.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (2 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Lima M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rosenkranz M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[5]
Torres J.
3-67-56-1
Semi-finals
Torres J.
Paz J.
6-43-0
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[5]
Olivieri G.[3]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.[3]
Juarez F.
6-746-26-4
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[5]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-67-667-64
Torres J.
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
6-46-4
Paz J.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
R16
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Sakamoto P.
6-46-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Verdasco F.[1]
7-56-3
Paz J.
Rubin N.
6-767-616-3
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[5]
De Lima M.
6-06-1
Torres J.
Vidal Azorin J.
4-66-46-3
Villanueva G.
Carou I.
1-66-16-2
Juarez F.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-0
Olivieri G.[3]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-0
R32
Villanueva G.
Gimeno Valero C.[7]
0-66-36-1
Sakamoto P.
Burruchaga R.
4-66-36-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Casanova H.[6]
6-26-1
Juarez F.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-0
Paz J.
Lama G.[4]
6-717-696-3
Carou I.
Loureiro J.
6-41-66-3
Vidal Azorin J.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-3
Torres J.
Luz O.[2]
6-756-46-4
Rubin N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-44-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Folliot Q.
6-36-0
Olivieri G.[3]
Pereira J.
6-22-0
Rodriguez C.
Okala J.
3-66-16-2
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[5]
Alves M.
6-46-4
De Lima M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-31-66-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-3
Verdasco F.[1]
Ribeiro E.
6-36-2