Ana Konjuh vs Marketa Vondrousova — Adelaide 2 Round of 16

Adelaide 2 · WTA · Round of 16
Ana Konjuh
CRO
Ana Konjuh
#932WTA
28 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Marketa Vondrousova
CZE6
Marketa Vondrousova
#132WTA
1907ELO
1826Hard ELO
$33kYTD
$12MCAREER
27 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWW
Konjuh A.
4-6 6-2 7-6
Vondrousova M.
Konjuh A.
46772
Vondrousova M.
62631

Ana Konjuh defeated Marketa Vondrousova 4-6 6-2 7-6 in the Adelaide 2 round of 16 on hard. Ana Konjuh extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-01PragueR16clayAna Konjuh6-4 7-6(2)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Konjuh A.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Vondrousova M.

Vondrousova M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Konjuh A.

Serve advantage — Vondrousova M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Konjuh A.Vondrousova M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
41%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Konjuh A.Vondrousova M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
88
Break points saved·Dominant
51
91
Break points won·Dominant
63
99
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Konjuh A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vondrousova M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 67 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
8.2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Keys M.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Zidansek T.[4]
W/O
Keys M.
Gauff C.[3]
3-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Brengle M.
3-3
Keys M.
Samsonova L.[8]
6-33-66-3
Zidansek T.[4]
Davis L.
7-647-67
Gauff C.[3]
Konjuh A.
6-36-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Vondrousova M.[6]
4-66-27-63
Brengle M.
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Paolini J.
4-66-46-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Inglis M.
6-26-1
Samsonova L.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-1
Keys M.
Martincova T.
6-16-3
Gauff C.[3]
Kostyuk M.
6-35-76-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Kalinina A.
6-16-3
R32
Kalinina A.
Cirstea S.[9]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[8]
Sherif M.
7-626-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Linette M.
6-46-4
Paolini J.
Hunter S.
7-56-2
Brengle M.
Potapova A.
7-54-66-1
Keys M.
Svitolina E.[2]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.[6]
Golubic V.
5-76-46-3
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
6-16-2
Zidansek T.[4]
Watson H.
2-66-27-64
Inglis M.
Kovinic D.
6-41-66-2
Davis L.
Teichmann J.[7]
1-67-636-4
Kostyuk M.
Rogers S.
6-36-4
Konjuh A.
Saville D.
6-27-64
Martincova T.
Yastremska D.
6-43-66-3
Peterson R.
Sabalenka A.[1]
5-76-17-5