Zsombor Piros vs Borna Gojo — Forli 2 CH Round of 16

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Piros Z.
6-7 6-1 6-3
Gojo B.
Piros Z.
65662
Gojo B.
77131

Zsombor Piros defeated Borna Gojo 6-7 6-1 6-3 in the Forli 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Borna Gojo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Zsombor Piros claimed a first win over Borna Gojo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-24Madrid MastersQ2clayBorna Gojo7-6(6) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
95
Break points won·Clear edge
32
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Gojo B.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 36 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1629
Surface ELO
5.1+33 Hard Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1683
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Gojo B.
Freshness·Dominant
54
100

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[8]
Clarke J.[3]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-756-3
Draper J.[8]
Piros Z.
6-43-1
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-637-63
Clarke J.[3]
Jubb P.
6-47-60
Andreev A.
Furness E.
7-664-66-3
Draper J.[8]
Ritschard A.
3-67-56-3
R16
Andreev A.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-3
Furness E.
Mchugh A.
4-66-16-4
Clarke J.[3]
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-3
Jubb P.
Stebe C.[5]
4-67-56-1
Draper J.[8]
Nardi L.
6-06-1
Ritschard A.
Copil M.
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Gojo B.
6-756-16-3
Pospisil V.[1]
Gigante M.
7-686-3
R32
Tiurnev E.
Hoang A.[2]
6-767-686-2
Furness E.
Mukund S.
7-646-0
Mchugh A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[3]
Mejia N.
4-66-36-4
Escoffier A.
Forti F.
7-666-746-3
Stebe C.[5]
Fatic N.
7-636-4
Draper J.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Copil M.
Kotov P.[4]
7-55-76-4
Gojo B.
Istomin D.[6]
6-26-4
Pospisil V.[1]
Brouwer G.
5-77-656-4
Ritschard A.
Napolitano S.
7-657-5
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-26-736-1
Gigante M.
Vatutin A.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
7-637-5