Matteo Gigante vs Alexey Vatutin — Forli 2 CH Round of 32

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1382Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Gigante M.
6-2 6-4
Vatutin A.
Gigante M.
662
Vatutin A.
240

Matteo Gigante defeated Alexey Vatutin 6-2 6-4 in the Forli 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Matteo Gigante came in ranked #526, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 183). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
0
Break points saved·Dominant
78
18
Break points won·Even
35
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Vatutin A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+152 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1382
7.2Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1415
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
6.4
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[8]
Clarke J.[3]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-756-3
Draper J.[8]
Piros Z.
6-43-1
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-637-63
Clarke J.[3]
Jubb P.
6-47-60
Andreev A.
Furness E.
7-664-66-3
Draper J.[8]
Ritschard A.
3-67-56-3
R16
Andreev A.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-3
Furness E.
Mchugh A.
4-66-16-4
Clarke J.[3]
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-3
Jubb P.
Stebe C.[5]
4-67-56-1
Draper J.[8]
Nardi L.
6-06-1
Ritschard A.
Copil M.
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Gojo B.
6-756-16-3
Pospisil V.[1]
Gigante M.
7-686-3
R32
Tiurnev E.
Hoang A.[2]
6-767-686-2
Furness E.
Mukund S.
7-646-0
Mchugh A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[3]
Mejia N.
4-66-36-4
Escoffier A.
Forti F.
7-666-746-3
Stebe C.[5]
Fatic N.
7-636-4
Draper J.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Copil M.
Kotov P.[4]
7-55-76-4
Gojo B.
Istomin D.[6]
6-26-4
Pospisil V.[1]
Brouwer G.
5-77-656-4
Ritschard A.
Napolitano S.
7-657-5
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-26-736-1
Gigante M.
Vatutin A.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
7-637-5