Vasek Pospisil vs Matteo Gigante — Forli 2 CH Round of 16

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN1
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Pospisil V.
7-6 6-3
Gigante M.
Pospisil V.
71062
Gigante M.
6830

Vasek Pospisil defeated Matteo Gigante 7-6 6-3 in the Forli 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matteo Gigante came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.5
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
78
Break points won·Dominant
7
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
72
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 43 days (−0.7)
Gigante M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[8]
Clarke J.[3]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-756-3
Draper J.[8]
Piros Z.
6-43-1
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-637-63
Clarke J.[3]
Jubb P.
6-47-60
Andreev A.
Furness E.
7-664-66-3
Draper J.[8]
Ritschard A.
3-67-56-3
R16
Andreev A.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-3
Furness E.
Mchugh A.
4-66-16-4
Clarke J.[3]
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-3
Jubb P.
Stebe C.[5]
4-67-56-1
Draper J.[8]
Nardi L.
6-06-1
Ritschard A.
Copil M.
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Gojo B.
6-756-16-3
Pospisil V.[1]
Gigante M.
7-686-3
R32
Tiurnev E.
Hoang A.[2]
6-767-686-2
Furness E.
Mukund S.
7-646-0
Mchugh A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[3]
Mejia N.
4-66-36-4
Escoffier A.
Forti F.
7-666-746-3
Stebe C.[5]
Fatic N.
7-636-4
Draper J.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Copil M.
Kotov P.[4]
7-55-76-4
Gojo B.
Istomin D.[6]
6-26-4
Pospisil V.[1]
Brouwer G.
5-77-656-4
Ritschard A.
Napolitano S.
7-657-5
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-26-736-1
Gigante M.
Vatutin A.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
7-637-5