Coco Gauff vs Ana Konjuh — Adelaide 2 Quarter-final

Adelaide 2 · WTA · Quarter-final
Coco Gauff
USA3
Coco Gauff
#4WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Ana Konjuh
CRO
Ana Konjuh
#932WTA
28 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Gauff C.
6-3 6-4
Konjuh A.
Gauff C.
662
Konjuh A.
340

Coco Gauff defeated Ana Konjuh 6-3 6-4 in the Adelaide 2 quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #4.

Key context

  • Match story: Coco Gauff closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Konjuh A.

Konjuh A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Konjuh A.
25
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Konjuh A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
41%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
5.8
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Konjuh A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
99
32
Break points saved·Dominant
96
51
Break points won·Dominant
100
63
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gauff C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Konjuh A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Konjuh A.
Freshness·
65
—

Gauff C.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Keys M.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Zidansek T.[4]
W/O
Keys M.
Gauff C.[3]
3-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Brengle M.
3-3
Keys M.
Samsonova L.[8]
6-33-66-3
Zidansek T.[4]
Davis L.
7-647-67
Gauff C.[3]
Konjuh A.
6-36-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Vondrousova M.[6]
4-66-27-63
Brengle M.
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Paolini J.
4-66-46-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Inglis M.
6-26-1
Samsonova L.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-1
Keys M.
Martincova T.
6-16-3
Gauff C.[3]
Kostyuk M.
6-35-76-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Kalinina A.
6-16-3
R32
Kalinina A.
Cirstea S.[9]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[8]
Sherif M.
7-626-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Linette M.
6-46-4
Paolini J.
Hunter S.
7-56-2
Brengle M.
Potapova A.
7-54-66-1
Keys M.
Svitolina E.[2]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.[6]
Golubic V.
5-76-46-3
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
6-16-2
Zidansek T.[4]
Watson H.
2-66-27-64
Inglis M.
Kovinic D.
6-41-66-2
Davis L.
Teichmann J.[7]
1-67-636-4
Kostyuk M.
Rogers S.
6-36-4
Konjuh A.
Saville D.
6-27-64
Martincova T.
Yastremska D.
6-43-66-3
Peterson R.
Sabalenka A.[1]
5-76-17-5