Caroline Garcia vs Jessica Pegula — Sydney Round of 32

Sydney · WTA · Round of 32
FRA
Caroline Garcia
#780WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Jessica Pegula
USA
Jessica Pegula
#4WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Garcia C.
6-4 7-6
Pegula J.
Garcia C.
6772
Pegula J.
4630

Caroline Garcia defeated Jessica Pegula 6-4 7-6 in the Sydney round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #4. Caroline Garcia extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-15CincinnatiQFhardCaroline Garcia6-1 7-5
2021-06-28WimbledonR128grassJessica Pegula6-3 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Pegula J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Garcia C.Pegula J.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
73

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Garcia C.Pegula J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
45%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garcia C.Pegula J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
96
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
96
Break points won·Dominant
50
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
93
100
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Garcia C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pegula J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Garcia C.Pegula J.
Freshness·
—
72

Pegula J.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Badosa P.[5]
Krejcikova B.[3]
6-34-67-64
Semi-finals
Badosa P.[5]
Kasatkina D.
6-26-2
Krejcikova B.[3]
Kontaveit A.[4]
0-66-47-612
Quarter-finals
Kontaveit A.[4]
Jabeur O.[7]
6-4
Badosa P.[5]
Bencic B.
7-663-66-3
Kasatkina D.
Muguruza G.[2]
6-46-4
Krejcikova B.[3]
Garcia C.
6-06-2
R16
Jabeur O.[7]
Kvitova P.
6-46-4
Garcia C.
Rybakina E.[9]
W/O
Krejcikova B.[3]
Cristian J.
6-17-5
Kontaveit A.[4]
Ruse E.
6-36-1
Badosa P.[5]
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-4
Bencic B.
Dodin O.
2-67-56-3
Muguruza G.[2]
Alexandrova E.
6-17-64
Kasatkina D.
Mertens E.
6-36-4
R32
Cristian J.
Hon P.
7-657-5
Badosa P.[5]
Ostapenko J.
7-616-1
Dodin O.
Olmos G.
6-46-1
Alexandrova E.
Shibahara E.
6-46-4
Rybakina E.[9]
Raducanu E.
6-06-1
Ruse E.
Frech M.
6-23-66-4
Jabeur O.[7]
Sharma A.
6-16-3
Bencic B.
Haddad Maia B.
6-36-2
Garcia C.
Pegula J.
6-47-63
Tomljanovic A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-3
Mertens E.
Ferro F.
6-27-65
Kasatkina D.
Kenin S.[8]
6-46-0
Kvitova P.
Rus A.
3-67-647-5
Kontaveit A.[4]
Zhang S.
6-36-3