Marton Fucsovics vs Botic Van De ZandschulpAdelaide 2 Round of 32

Adelaide 2 · ATP · Round of 32
#78ATP
1756ELO
1719Hard ELO
$550kYTD
$8.7MCAREER
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Fucsovics M.
6-3 7-6
Van De Zandschulp B.
Fucsovics M.
6772
Van De Zandschulp B.
3640

Marton Fucsovics defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 7-6 in the Adelaide 2 round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Marton Fucsovics narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

12
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-17Winston-SalemFhardMarton Fucsovics6-3 7-6(3)
2023-04-10Monte Carlo MastersR64clayBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 7-6(2) 6-1
2021-11-08StockholmR16hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(3) 3-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Fucsovics M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fucsovics M.

Serve advantage — Fucsovics M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fucsovics M.Van De Zandschulp B.
23
Serve
41
73
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
73
77
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Even
65
68
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
47
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+9 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Hard Elo 1711
5.1Overall Elo 1756
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1743
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Even
89
91

Fucsovics M.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast