Lauren Davis vs Jil Teichmann — Adelaide 2 Round of 32

Adelaide 2 · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Jil Teichmann
SUI7
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Davis L.
1-6 7-6 6-4
Teichmann J.
Davis L.
17762
Teichmann J.
66341

Lauren Davis defeated Jil Teichmann 1-6 7-6 6-4 in the Adelaide 2 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lauren Davis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lauren Davis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-20DubaiR64hardLauren Davis6-4 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
50
Break points saved·Dominant
26
71
Break points won·Slight edge
79
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Teichmann J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 65 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Davis L.Teichmann J.
Freshness·
—
100

Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Keys M.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Zidansek T.[4]
W/O
Keys M.
Gauff C.[3]
3-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Riske Amritraj A.
Brengle M.
3-3
Keys M.
Samsonova L.[8]
6-33-66-3
Zidansek T.[4]
Davis L.
7-647-67
Gauff C.[3]
Konjuh A.
6-36-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Vondrousova M.[6]
4-66-27-63
Brengle M.
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Paolini J.
4-66-46-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Inglis M.
6-26-1
Samsonova L.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-1
Keys M.
Martincova T.
6-16-3
Gauff C.[3]
Kostyuk M.
6-35-76-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Kalinina A.
6-16-3
R32
Kalinina A.
Cirstea S.[9]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[8]
Sherif M.
7-626-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Linette M.
6-46-4
Paolini J.
Hunter S.
7-56-2
Brengle M.
Potapova A.
7-54-66-1
Keys M.
Svitolina E.[2]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.[6]
Golubic V.
5-76-46-3
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
6-16-2
Zidansek T.[4]
Watson H.
2-66-27-64
Inglis M.
Kovinic D.
6-41-66-2
Davis L.
Teichmann J.[7]
1-67-636-4
Kostyuk M.
Rogers S.
6-36-4
Konjuh A.
Saville D.
6-27-64
Martincova T.
Yastremska D.
6-43-66-3
Peterson R.
Sabalenka A.[1]
5-76-17-5