Marius Copil vs Pavel Kotov — Forli 2 CH Round of 32

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Pavel Kotov
RUS4
Pavel Kotov
#246ATP
1597ELO
1601Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Copil M.
7-5 5-7 6-4
Kotov P.
Copil M.
7562
Kotov P.
5741

Marius Copil defeated Pavel Kotov 7-5 5-7 6-4 in the Forli 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Pavel Kotov came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Kotov P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Kotov P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Kotov P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
59
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Slight edge
3
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
82
Tiebreaks·Even
79
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Kotov P.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.8
0.0
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[8]
Clarke J.[3]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-756-3
Draper J.[8]
Piros Z.
6-43-1
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-637-63
Clarke J.[3]
Jubb P.
6-47-60
Andreev A.
Furness E.
7-664-66-3
Draper J.[8]
Ritschard A.
3-67-56-3
R16
Andreev A.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-3
Furness E.
Mchugh A.
4-66-16-4
Clarke J.[3]
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-3
Jubb P.
Stebe C.[5]
4-67-56-1
Draper J.[8]
Nardi L.
6-06-1
Ritschard A.
Copil M.
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Gojo B.
6-756-16-3
Pospisil V.[1]
Gigante M.
7-686-3
R32
Tiurnev E.
Hoang A.[2]
6-767-686-2
Furness E.
Mukund S.
7-646-0
Mchugh A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[3]
Mejia N.
4-66-36-4
Escoffier A.
Forti F.
7-666-746-3
Stebe C.[5]
Fatic N.
7-636-4
Draper J.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Copil M.
Kotov P.[4]
7-55-76-4
Gojo B.
Istomin D.[6]
6-26-4
Pospisil V.[1]
Brouwer G.
5-77-656-4
Ritschard A.
Napolitano S.
7-657-5
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-26-736-1
Gigante M.
Vatutin A.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
7-637-5