Marin Cilic vs Jaume Munar — Adelaide 2 Round of 16

Adelaide 2 · ATP · Round of 16
Marin Cilic
CRO4
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2022
hard
Jaume Munar
ESP
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1743Hard ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Cilic M.
7-6 6-2
Munar J.
Cilic M.
7862
Munar J.
6620

Marin Cilic defeated Jaume Munar 7-6 6-2 in the Adelaide 2 round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Marin Cilic extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marin Cilic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonR32grassMarin Cilic6-3 3-6 6-2 6-4
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardMarin Cilic6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Munar J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cilic M.Munar J.
57
Serve
42
10
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Munar J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Munar J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
50
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Dominant
41
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Munar J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+19 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1743
5.0Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1766
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Munar J.
Freshness·Clear edge
98
86

Cilic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Munar J.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kokkinakis T.
Rinderknech A.
6-767-656-3
Semi-finals
Kokkinakis T.
Cilic M.[4]
6-23-67-610
Rinderknech A.
Moutet C.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Kokkinakis T.
Vukic A.
6-756-36-2
Cilic M.[4]
Paul T.
6-42-66-3
Moutet C.
Monteiro T.
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Khachanov K.[3]
7-677-5
R16
Kokkinakis T.
Isner J.[2]
6-757-657-64
Monteiro T.
Monfils G.[1]
6-726-31-0
Khachanov K.[3]
Mager G.
7-56-3
Cilic M.[4]
Munar J.
7-666-2
Vukic A.
Johnson S.
6-47-5
Moutet C.
Fucsovics M.[8]
6-26-2
Rinderknech A.
Kwon S.
5-76-36-2
Paul T.
Bonzi B.
6-47-66
R32
Mager G.
Gerasimov E.
4-67-56-4
Johnson S.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.[8]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-64
Paul T.
Tiafoe F.[7]
6-26-3
Moutet C.
Struff J.
6-26-4
Kokkinakis T.
Paire B.
6-46-0
Bonzi B.
Carballes Baena R.
6-36-3
Munar J.
Millman J.
6-26-2
Monteiro T.
Nishioka Y.
1-66-36-4
Rinderknech A.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-756-3
Kwon S.
Harris L.[5]
5-77-56-4
Vukic A.
Bublik A.[6]
7-656-2