Jaroslav Pospisil vs Matthew Christopher Romios — Bendigo CH Round of 64

Bendigo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
CZE
Jaroslav Pospisil
45 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
AUS
Matthew Christopher Romios
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Pospisil J.
6-2 6-3
Romios M.
Pospisil J.
662
Romios M.
230

Jaroslav Pospisil defeated Matthew Christopher Romios 6-2 6-3 in the Bendigo CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Romios M.

Romios M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Pospisil J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil J.Romios M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
49%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (10 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Romios M.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 700 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Escobedo E.[8]
Couacaud E.[10]
5-76-37-5
Semi-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Agamenone F.
6-16-766-4
Escobedo E.[8]
Caruso S.[5]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Halys Q.[4]
6-757-697-5
Agamenone F.
Popko D.[11]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.[8]
Kopriva V.
6-36-727-62
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.[3]
4-67-654-0
R16
Escobedo E.[8]
Jung J.[9]
6-24-66-2
Grenier H.[3]
Bergs Z.[16]
6-05-77-65
Couacaud E.[10]
Fabbiano T.
7-53-66-4
Popko D.[11]
Cobolli F.
6-37-5
Agamenone F.
Bachinger M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Mena F.
7-6114-66-3
Halys Q.[4]
Bourgue M.
6-26-4
Caruso S.[5]
Elias G.
W/O
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Mmoh M.
7-653-66-3
Mena F.
Kuzmanov D.[14]
7-676-4
Cobolli F.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-43-66-1
Bergs Z.[16]
Pospisil J.
6-17-64
Escobedo E.[8]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-1
Caruso S.[5]
Muller A.
2-66-26-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.[13]
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-0
Popko D.[11]
Basic M.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Olivo R.[15]
6-46-2
Elias G.
Rola B.[12]
6-43-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Ilkel C.[2]
7-646-3
Bachinger M.
Milojevic N.[1]
6-26-1
Couacaud E.[10]
Kicker N.
6-716-46-4
Jung J.[9]
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-667-61
R64
Kopriva V.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-1
Trungelliti M.
Moroni G.
7-57-66
Elias G.
Pearson K.
6-26-1
Muller A.
Mccabe J.
6-06-736-4
Bourgue M.
Bouzige M.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.
Kelly D.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-36-0
Kicker N.
Baldi F.
6-36-1
Basic M.
Fancutt T.
7-666-4
Cobolli F.
Addison A.
6-27-64
Bachinger M.
Safwat M.
4-67-637-64
Agamenone F.
Errey C.
6-27-65
Giustino L.
Camus C.
7-626-3
Pospisil J.
Romios M.
6-26-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4