Zsombor Piros vs Louis Wessels — Forli 1 CH Round of 32

Forli 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN7
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Louis Wessels
GER
Louis Wessels
#723ATP
27 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWLWW
Piros Z.
6-4 6-4
Wessels L.
Piros Z.
662
Wessels L.
440

Zsombor Piros defeated Louis Wessels 6-4 6-4 in the Forli 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wessels L.

Wessels L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Wessels L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Wessels L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
71
Break points won·Dominant
32
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
58
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 36 days (−0.7)
Wessels L.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
1.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Wessels L.
Freshness·Dominant
48
86

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Wessels L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Mukund S.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Mukund S.
Piros Z.[7]
6-37-64
Nardi L.
Stebe C.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.[2]
Potenza L.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Benchetrit E.
6-37-65
Piros Z.[7]
Clarke J.[1]
6-36-3
Nardi L.
Harrison C.[3]
1-67-56-2
R16
Clarke J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-667-66
Stebe C.[2]
Lenz J.
6-27-62
Potenza L.
Zhang Z.
7-56-4
Nardi L.
Furness E.[8]
6-756-46-1
Benchetrit E.
Wu T.[4]
7-616-3
Piros Z.[7]
Vrbensky M.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-2
Harrison C.[3]
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-2
R32
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Oliveira G.[6]
6-46-4
Stebe C.[2]
Lazarov A.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Napolitano S.
7-633-67-64
Potenza L.
Ritschard A.[5]
5-76-47-68
Nardi L.
Catarina L.
3-66-36-2
Furness E.[8]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Forti F.
7-636-3
Benchetrit E.
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Wu T.[4]
Andreev A.
7-55-76-2
Piros Z.[7]
Wessels L.
6-46-4
Vrbensky M.
Viola M.
6-46-2
Clarke J.[1]
Jahn J.
6-46-2
Harrison C.[3]
Setkic A.
2-67-57-63
Vatutin A.
Chappell N.
6-756-26-2
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0