Zsombor Piros vs Michael Vrbensky — Forli 1 CH Round of 16

Forli 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN7
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Michael Vrbensky
CZE
Michael Vrbensky
#744ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Piros Z.
6-2 6-3
Vrbensky M.
Piros Z.
662
Vrbensky M.
230

Zsombor Piros defeated Michael Vrbensky 6-2 6-3 in the Forli 1 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Vrbensky M.

Vrbensky M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Vrbensky M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 152). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Vrbensky M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
11
Break points saved·Dominant
84
52
Break points won·Clear edge
32
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 36 days (−0.7)
Vrbensky M.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
1.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Vrbensky M.
Freshness·Dominant
54
100

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Vrbensky M.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Mukund S.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Mukund S.
Piros Z.[7]
6-37-64
Nardi L.
Stebe C.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.[2]
Potenza L.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Benchetrit E.
6-37-65
Piros Z.[7]
Clarke J.[1]
6-36-3
Nardi L.
Harrison C.[3]
1-67-56-2
R16
Clarke J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-667-66
Stebe C.[2]
Lenz J.
6-27-62
Potenza L.
Zhang Z.
7-56-4
Nardi L.
Furness E.[8]
6-756-46-1
Benchetrit E.
Wu T.[4]
7-616-3
Piros Z.[7]
Vrbensky M.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-2
Harrison C.[3]
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-2
R32
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Oliveira G.[6]
6-46-4
Stebe C.[2]
Lazarov A.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Napolitano S.
7-633-67-64
Potenza L.
Ritschard A.[5]
5-76-47-68
Nardi L.
Catarina L.
3-66-36-2
Furness E.[8]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Forti F.
7-636-3
Benchetrit E.
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Wu T.[4]
Andreev A.
7-55-76-2
Piros Z.[7]
Wessels L.
6-46-4
Vrbensky M.
Viola M.
6-46-2
Clarke J.[1]
Jahn J.
6-46-2
Harrison C.[3]
Setkic A.
2-67-57-63
Vatutin A.
Chappell N.
6-756-26-2
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0