Ann Li vs Mayar Sherif — Melbourne 2 Round of 32

Melbourne 2 · WTA · Round of 32
Ann Li
USA7
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Mayar Sherif
EGY
Mayar Sherif
#97WTA
1685ELO
1505Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Li A.
6-2 6-0
Sherif M.
Li A.
662
Sherif M.
200

Ann Li defeated Mayar Sherif 6-2 6-0 in the Melbourne 2 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ann Li extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-21MiamiR128hardAnn Li2-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sherif M.

Sherif M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Li A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Sherif M.
47
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Sherif M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Sherif M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
67
Break points saved·Even
83
84
Break points won·Slight edge
87
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
58
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Sherif M.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
8.4+241 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1505
7.4Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1685
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Sherif M.
Freshness·Dominant
97
52

Li A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sherif M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 115 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Anisimova A.
Sasnovich A.
7-51-66-4
Semi-finals
Sasnovich A.
Li A.[7]
7-642-66-3
Anisimova A.
Kasatkina D.[3]
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Sasnovich A.
Tauson C.[6]
6-32-0
Kasatkina D.[3]
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-56-1
Anisimova A.
Begu I.
2-66-36-2
Li A.[7]
Rakhimova K.
6-17-5
R16
Begu I.
Paolini J.
3-66-26-3
Rakhimova K.
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
7-636-4
Tauson C.[6]
Zhu L.
6-16-0
Li A.[7]
Sevastova A.
6-16-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Liu C.
3-67-56-1
Anisimova A.
Cirstea S.[5]
6-46-1
Kasatkina D.[3]
Keys M.
7-642-66-3
Sasnovich A.
Peterson R.
6-26-4
R32
Peterson R.
Sharma A.
6-13-66-2
Kasatkina D.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-13-0
Cirstea S.[5]
Gracheva V.
6-06-0
Zhu L.
Stosur S.
7-657-65
Begu I.
Pegula J.[1]
7-666-3
Li A.[7]
Sherif M.
6-26-0
Sevastova A.
Garcia C.
6-46-4
Sasnovich A.
Wang X.
6-46-2
Keys M.
Dart H.
6-37-62
Tauson C.[6]
Kalinina A.
7-56-3
Anisimova A.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-651-67-5
Liu C.
Kostyuk M.[8]
4-66-46-3
Paolini J.
Schmiedlova A.
2-66-36-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Perez E.
6-06-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
Haddad Maia B.
6-45-76-3
Rakhimova K.
Minnen G.
7-57-5