Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Julian Lenz — Forli 1 CH Round of 16

Forli 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER2
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLW
Stebe C.
6-2 7-6
Lenz J.
Stebe C.
6772
Lenz J.
2620

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Julian Lenz 6-2 7-6 in the Forli 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Lenz J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Lenz J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Lenz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
12
Break points saved·Dominant
75
40
Break points won·Even
10
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Lenz J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Mukund S.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Mukund S.
Piros Z.[7]
6-37-64
Nardi L.
Stebe C.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.[2]
Potenza L.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Benchetrit E.
6-37-65
Piros Z.[7]
Clarke J.[1]
6-36-3
Nardi L.
Harrison C.[3]
1-67-56-2
R16
Clarke J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-667-66
Stebe C.[2]
Lenz J.
6-27-62
Potenza L.
Zhang Z.
7-56-4
Nardi L.
Furness E.[8]
6-756-46-1
Benchetrit E.
Wu T.[4]
7-616-3
Piros Z.[7]
Vrbensky M.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-2
Harrison C.[3]
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-2
R32
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Oliveira G.[6]
6-46-4
Stebe C.[2]
Lazarov A.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Napolitano S.
7-633-67-64
Potenza L.
Ritschard A.[5]
5-76-47-68
Nardi L.
Catarina L.
3-66-36-2
Furness E.[8]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Mukund S.
Forti F.
7-636-3
Benchetrit E.
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Wu T.[4]
Andreev A.
7-55-76-2
Piros Z.[7]
Wessels L.
6-46-4
Vrbensky M.
Viola M.
6-46-2
Clarke J.[1]
Jahn J.
6-46-2
Harrison C.[3]
Setkic A.
2-67-57-63
Vatutin A.
Chappell N.
6-756-26-2
Mchugh A.
Angelini L.
6-46-0