Ana Konjuh vs Tereza Martincova — Melbourne 1 Round of 32

Melbourne 1 · WTA · Round of 32
Ana Konjuh
CRO
Ana Konjuh
#932WTA
28 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Tereza Martincova
CZE7
Tereza Martincova
#283WTA
1589ELO
1573Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Konjuh A.
6-4 6-4
Martincova T.
Konjuh A.
662
Martincova T.
440

Ana Konjuh defeated Tereza Martincova 6-4 6-4 in the Melbourne 1 round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ana Konjuh edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Konjuh A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Martincova T.

Martincova T.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Konjuh A.

Serve advantage — Martincova T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Konjuh A.Martincova T.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Konjuh A.Martincova T.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
51
36
Break points won·Even
63
67
Deciding sets·Slight edge
58
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Konjuh A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 89 days (−1.2)
Martincova T.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Halep S.[2]
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Osaka N.[1]
W/O
Halep S.[2]
Zheng Q.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zheng Q.
Konjuh A.
7-617-66
Osaka N.[1]
Petkovic A.
6-17-5
Kudermetova V.[3]
Potapova A.
6-24-66-0
Halep S.[2]
Golubic V.[6]
6-25-76-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Kanepi K.
6-23-66-3
Halep S.[2]
Ruse E.
6-26-1
Zheng Q.
Zvonareva V.
5-76-36-4
Kudermetova V.[3]
Brengle M.
6-03-67-5
Golubic V.[6]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-36-0
Osaka N.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-16-1
Potapova A.
Bondar A.
6-46-747-5
Petkovic A.
Burel C.
7-52-66-4
R32
Brengle M.
Hibino N.
7-637-64
Petkovic A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.[3]
Hruncakova V.
7-647-66
Osaka N.[1]
Cornet A.
6-43-66-3
Konjuh A.
Martincova T.[7]
6-46-4
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Mendez S.
6-36-4
Ruse E.
Rodionova A.
6-36-2
Zvonareva V.
Riske Amritraj A.[9]
7-56-3
Burel C.
Zhang S.
6-37-66
Bondar A.
Siniakova K.[8]
7-57-68
Halep S.[2]
Aiava D.
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Hontama M.
4-66-26-3
Potapova A.
Cabrera L.
5-76-26-2
Zanevska M.
Martic P.
6-36-4
Kanepi K.
Cristian J.
6-727-676-2
Golubic V.[6]
Davis L.
7-56-1