Harold Mayot vs David Hough — Traralgon CH Round of 64

Traralgon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#199ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
AUS
David Hough
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Mayot H.
6-1 6-2
Hough D.
Mayot H.
662
Hough D.
120

Harold Mayot defeated David Hough 6-1 6-2 in the Traralgon CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Hough D.

Hough D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Serve advantage — Mayot H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Hough D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Dominant
70%
43%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
40%
Service points won·Clear edge
63%
42%
Return points won·Clear edge
38%
20%
Break points saved·Dominant
62%
17%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Hough D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Hough D.
Freshness·
99
—

Mayot H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[4]
Fratangelo B.[5]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Fratangelo B.[5]
Krueger M.[6]
7-666-767-68
Machac T.[4]
De Jong J.[12]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Serdarusic N.
5-76-46-1
Machac T.[4]
Kukushkin M.[8]
3-66-36-2
De Jong J.[12]
Simon G.[1]
6-46-1
Fratangelo B.[5]
Lehecka J.[2]
1-66-37-65
R16
Simon G.[1]
Blancaneaux G.[15]
6-02-1
Krueger M.[6]
Coppejans K.[11]
6-46-766-1
Kukushkin M.[8]
Huesler M.[9]
6-47-66
Machac T.[4]
Santillan A.
6-16-2
Lehecka J.[2]
Marterer M.[13]
4-66-17-5
Serdarusic N.
Kuhn N.
6-37-68
Fratangelo B.[5]
Horansky F.[10]
6-47-65
De Jong J.[12]
Wolf J.[7]
7-637-610
R32
Wolf J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-24-66-4
Machac T.[4]
Mayot H.
6-24-64-1
Kukushkin M.[8]
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Lehecka J.[2]
Ignatik U.
7-56-746-3
Horansky F.[10]
Walkin B.
6-27-5
De Jong J.[12]
Stricker D.
7-56-2
Blancaneaux G.[15]
Sachko V.
7-57-65
Serdarusic N.
Haase R.[14]
6-46-3
Fratangelo B.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-1
Santillan A.
Ficovich J.[16]
6-06-1
Krueger M.[6]
Skatov T.
6-16-0
Simon G.[1]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-06-2
Huesler M.[9]
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[13]
Guinard M.
2-66-36-4
Coppejans K.[11]
Cachin P.
6-797-636-3
Kuhn N.
Kolar Z.[3]
6-36-4
R64
Santillan A.
Rosol L.
7-56-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Kamke T.
7-626-2
Guinard M.
Schoolkate T.
7-627-63
Walkin B.
Bourchier H.
3-66-46-4
Sweeny D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Sachko V.
Fitzgerald P.
6-16-4
Cachin P.
Charlton J.
6-26-2
Stricker D.
Sharan D.
6-46-2
Ellis B.
Puttergill C.
6-12-66-3
Kuhn N.
Sekulic P.
6-756-27-64
Serdarusic N.
Statham J.
3-66-36-2
Soeda G.
Gulbis E.
3-66-37-5
Skatov T.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Mayot H.
Hough D.
6-16-2
Watanuki Y.
Jin J.
6-37-61
Ignatik U.
Moriya H.
6-16-3