Qinwen Zheng vs Mai Hontama — Melbourne 1 Round of 32

Melbourne 1 · WTA · Round of 32
Qinwen Zheng
CHN
Qinwen Zheng
#135WTA
1852ELO
1832Hard ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Mai Hontama
JPN
Mai Hontama
#202WTA
1480ELO
1442Hard ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWLW
Zheng Q.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Hontama M.
Zheng Q.
4662
Hontama M.
6231

Qinwen Zheng defeated Mai Hontama 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Melbourne 1 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Qinwen Zheng came in ranked #135.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hontama M.

Hontama M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Hontama M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
53%
67%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Hontama M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
29
Break points saved·Dominant
96
27
Break points won·Even
100
96
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Hontama M.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 89 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0+390 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1442
10.0Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1480
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Hontama M.
Freshness·Even
88
86

Zheng Q.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Hontama M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Halep S.[2]
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Osaka N.[1]
W/O
Halep S.[2]
Zheng Q.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zheng Q.
Konjuh A.
7-617-66
Osaka N.[1]
Petkovic A.
6-17-5
Kudermetova V.[3]
Potapova A.
6-24-66-0
Halep S.[2]
Golubic V.[6]
6-25-76-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Kanepi K.
6-23-66-3
Halep S.[2]
Ruse E.
6-26-1
Zheng Q.
Zvonareva V.
5-76-36-4
Kudermetova V.[3]
Brengle M.
6-03-67-5
Golubic V.[6]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-36-0
Osaka N.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-16-1
Potapova A.
Bondar A.
6-46-747-5
Petkovic A.
Burel C.
7-52-66-4
R32
Brengle M.
Hibino N.
7-637-64
Petkovic A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.[3]
Hruncakova V.
7-647-66
Osaka N.[1]
Cornet A.
6-43-66-3
Konjuh A.
Martincova T.[7]
6-46-4
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Mendez S.
6-36-4
Ruse E.
Rodionova A.
6-36-2
Zvonareva V.
Riske Amritraj A.[9]
7-56-3
Burel C.
Zhang S.
6-37-66
Bondar A.
Siniakova K.[8]
7-57-68
Halep S.[2]
Aiava D.
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Hontama M.
4-66-26-3
Potapova A.
Cabrera L.
5-76-26-2
Zanevska M.
Martic P.
6-36-4
Kanepi K.
Cristian J.
6-727-676-2
Golubic V.[6]
Davis L.
7-56-1