Maxime Cressy vs Jaume Munar — Melbourne Quarter-final

Melbourne · ATP · Quarter-final
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Jaume Munar
ESP
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1743Hard ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Cressy M.
7-6 6-4
Munar J.
Cressy M.
7762
Munar J.
6340

Maxime Cressy defeated Jaume Munar 7-6 6-4 in the Melbourne quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jaume Munar came in ranked #44.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Munar J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cressy M.Munar J.
—
Serve
42
—
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Munar J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
9.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Munar J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
50
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Dominant
2
66
Deciding sets·Even
32
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Munar J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cressy M.Munar J.
Freshness·
—
86

Munar J.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nadal R.[1]
Cressy M.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Cressy M.
Dimitrov G.[3]
7-57-69
Nadal R.[1]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Nadal R.[1]
Griekspoor T.
W/O
Dimitrov G.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-756-07-5
Cressy M.
Munar J.
7-636-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Molcan A.
6-26-1
R16
Molcan A.
Goffin D.[4]
7-56-3
Griekspoor T.
Popyrin A.
6-34-66-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Opelka R.[2]
4-67-657-69
Munar J.
Laaksonen H.
6-17-5
Dimitrov G.[3]
Bagnis F.
5-77-636-3
Nadal R.[1]
Berankis R.
6-27-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Thompson J.
7-635-76-3
R32
Laaksonen H.
Paire B.[5]
4-66-35-2
Munar J.
Anderson K.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.[8]
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Thompson J.
Oconnell C.
1-67-56-4
Griekspoor T.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Berankis R.
Giron M.
7-56-4
Molcan A.
Seppi A.
6-46-766-3
Popyrin A.
Travaglia S.
7-656-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Baez S.
7-626-1
Bagnis F.
Murray A.
6-35-76-3
Cressy M.
Hijikata R.
6-36-0