Enzo Couacaud vs Thomas Fabbiano — Bendigo CH Round of 16

Bendigo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA10
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Couacaud E.
7-5 3-6 6-4
Fabbiano T.
Couacaud E.
7362
Fabbiano T.
5641

Enzo Couacaud defeated Thomas Fabbiano 7-5 3-6 6-4 in the Bendigo CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Enzo Couacaud closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
28
Break points saved·Even
79
81
Break points won·Clear edge
29
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
29
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Fabbiano T.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Escobedo E.[8]
Couacaud E.[10]
5-76-37-5
Semi-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Agamenone F.
6-16-766-4
Escobedo E.[8]
Caruso S.[5]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Halys Q.[4]
6-757-697-5
Agamenone F.
Popko D.[11]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.[8]
Kopriva V.
6-36-727-62
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.[3]
4-67-654-0
R16
Escobedo E.[8]
Jung J.[9]
6-24-66-2
Grenier H.[3]
Bergs Z.[16]
6-05-77-65
Couacaud E.[10]
Fabbiano T.
7-53-66-4
Popko D.[11]
Cobolli F.
6-37-5
Agamenone F.
Bachinger M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Mena F.
7-6114-66-3
Halys Q.[4]
Bourgue M.
6-26-4
Caruso S.[5]
Elias G.
W/O
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Mmoh M.
7-653-66-3
Mena F.
Kuzmanov D.[14]
7-676-4
Cobolli F.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-43-66-1
Bergs Z.[16]
Pospisil J.
6-17-64
Escobedo E.[8]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-1
Caruso S.[5]
Muller A.
2-66-26-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.[13]
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-0
Popko D.[11]
Basic M.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Olivo R.[15]
6-46-2
Elias G.
Rola B.[12]
6-43-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Ilkel C.[2]
7-646-3
Bachinger M.
Milojevic N.[1]
6-26-1
Couacaud E.[10]
Kicker N.
6-716-46-4
Jung J.[9]
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-667-61
R64
Kopriva V.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-1
Trungelliti M.
Moroni G.
7-57-66
Elias G.
Pearson K.
6-26-1
Muller A.
Mccabe J.
6-06-736-4
Bourgue M.
Bouzige M.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.
Kelly D.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-36-0
Kicker N.
Baldi F.
6-36-1
Basic M.
Fancutt T.
7-666-4
Cobolli F.
Addison A.
6-27-64
Bachinger M.
Safwat M.
4-67-637-64
Agamenone F.
Errey C.
6-27-65
Giustino L.
Camus C.
7-626-3
Pospisil J.
Romios M.
6-26-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4