Naomi Osaka vs Alize Cornet — Melbourne 1 Round of 32

Melbourne 1 · WTA · Round of 32
Naomi Osaka
JPN1
Naomi Osaka
#13WTA
1987ELO
1922Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
FRA
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Osaka N.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Cornet A.
Osaka N.
6362
Cornet A.
4631

Naomi Osaka defeated Alize Cornet 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Melbourne 1 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Naomi Osaka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Naomi Osaka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Naomi Osaka closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-31Gippsland TrophyR32hardNaomi Osaka6-2 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Osaka N.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Cornet A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Osaka N.Cornet A.
70
Serve
—
60
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Osaka N.Cornet A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (118 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osaka N.Cornet A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
53
Break points saved·Dominant
96
57
Break points won·Clear edge
97
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osaka N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 140 days (−1.5)
Cornet A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.7
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Osaka N.Cornet A.
Freshness·
88
—

Osaka N.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Halep S.[2]
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Osaka N.[1]
W/O
Halep S.[2]
Zheng Q.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zheng Q.
Konjuh A.
7-617-66
Osaka N.[1]
Petkovic A.
6-17-5
Kudermetova V.[3]
Potapova A.
6-24-66-0
Halep S.[2]
Golubic V.[6]
6-25-76-4
R16
Konjuh A.
Kanepi K.
6-23-66-3
Halep S.[2]
Ruse E.
6-26-1
Zheng Q.
Zvonareva V.
5-76-36-4
Kudermetova V.[3]
Brengle M.
6-03-67-5
Golubic V.[6]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-36-0
Osaka N.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-16-1
Potapova A.
Bondar A.
6-46-747-5
Petkovic A.
Burel C.
7-52-66-4
R32
Brengle M.
Hibino N.
7-637-64
Petkovic A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.[3]
Hruncakova V.
7-647-66
Osaka N.[1]
Cornet A.
6-43-66-3
Konjuh A.
Martincova T.[7]
6-46-4
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Mendez S.
6-36-4
Ruse E.
Rodionova A.
6-36-2
Zvonareva V.
Riske Amritraj A.[9]
7-56-3
Burel C.
Zhang S.
6-37-66
Bondar A.
Siniakova K.[8]
7-57-68
Halep S.[2]
Aiava D.
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Hontama M.
4-66-26-3
Potapova A.
Cabrera L.
5-76-26-2
Zanevska M.
Martic P.
6-36-4
Kanepi K.
Cristian J.
6-727-676-2
Golubic V.[6]
Davis L.
7-56-1