Lorenzo Giustino vs Charlie Camus — Bendigo CH Round of 64

Bendigo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1426Hard ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
FRA
Charlie Camus
#1964ATP
19 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLW
Giustino L.
7-6 6-3
Camus C.
Giustino L.
7762
Camus C.
6230

Lorenzo Giustino defeated Charlie Camus 7-6 6-3 in the Bendigo CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Giustino L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Camus C.

Camus C.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Serve advantage — Giustino L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giustino L.Camus C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giustino L.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Camus C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Giustino L.Camus C.
Freshness·Dominant
51
100

Giustino L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d) · Camus C.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Escobedo E.[8]
Couacaud E.[10]
5-76-37-5
Semi-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Agamenone F.
6-16-766-4
Escobedo E.[8]
Caruso S.[5]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[10]
Halys Q.[4]
6-757-697-5
Agamenone F.
Popko D.[11]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.[8]
Kopriva V.
6-36-727-62
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.[3]
4-67-654-0
R16
Escobedo E.[8]
Jung J.[9]
6-24-66-2
Grenier H.[3]
Bergs Z.[16]
6-05-77-65
Couacaud E.[10]
Fabbiano T.
7-53-66-4
Popko D.[11]
Cobolli F.
6-37-5
Agamenone F.
Bachinger M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Mena F.
7-6114-66-3
Halys Q.[4]
Bourgue M.
6-26-4
Caruso S.[5]
Elias G.
W/O
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Mmoh M.
7-653-66-3
Mena F.
Kuzmanov D.[14]
7-676-4
Cobolli F.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-43-66-1
Bergs Z.[16]
Pospisil J.
6-17-64
Escobedo E.[8]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-1
Caruso S.[5]
Muller A.
2-66-26-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.[13]
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-0
Popko D.[11]
Basic M.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Olivo R.[15]
6-46-2
Elias G.
Rola B.[12]
6-43-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Ilkel C.[2]
7-646-3
Bachinger M.
Milojevic N.[1]
6-26-1
Couacaud E.[10]
Kicker N.
6-716-46-4
Jung J.[9]
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-667-61
R64
Kopriva V.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-1
Trungelliti M.
Moroni G.
7-57-66
Elias G.
Pearson K.
6-26-1
Muller A.
Mccabe J.
6-06-736-4
Bourgue M.
Bouzige M.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.
Kelly D.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-36-0
Kicker N.
Baldi F.
6-36-1
Basic M.
Fancutt T.
7-666-4
Cobolli F.
Addison A.
6-27-64
Bachinger M.
Safwat M.
4-67-637-64
Agamenone F.
Errey C.
6-27-65
Giustino L.
Camus C.
7-626-3
Pospisil J.
Romios M.
6-26-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4