Pedro Cachin vs Joshua Charlton — Traralgon CH Round of 64

Traralgon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
AUS
Joshua Charlton
#763ATP
26 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLW
Cachin P.
6-2 6-2
Charlton J.
Cachin P.
662
Charlton J.
220

Pedro Cachin defeated Joshua Charlton 6-2 6-2 in the Traralgon CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Charlton J.

Charlton J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Charlton J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
69%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cachin P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Charlton J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1897 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.[4]
Fratangelo B.[5]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Fratangelo B.[5]
Krueger M.[6]
7-666-767-68
Machac T.[4]
De Jong J.[12]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Serdarusic N.
5-76-46-1
Machac T.[4]
Kukushkin M.[8]
3-66-36-2
De Jong J.[12]
Simon G.[1]
6-46-1
Fratangelo B.[5]
Lehecka J.[2]
1-66-37-65
R16
Simon G.[1]
Blancaneaux G.[15]
6-02-1
Krueger M.[6]
Coppejans K.[11]
6-46-766-1
Kukushkin M.[8]
Huesler M.[9]
6-47-66
Machac T.[4]
Santillan A.
6-16-2
Lehecka J.[2]
Marterer M.[13]
4-66-17-5
Serdarusic N.
Kuhn N.
6-37-68
Fratangelo B.[5]
Horansky F.[10]
6-47-65
De Jong J.[12]
Wolf J.[7]
7-637-610
R32
Wolf J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-24-66-4
Machac T.[4]
Mayot H.
6-24-64-1
Kukushkin M.[8]
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Lehecka J.[2]
Ignatik U.
7-56-746-3
Horansky F.[10]
Walkin B.
6-27-5
De Jong J.[12]
Stricker D.
7-56-2
Blancaneaux G.[15]
Sachko V.
7-57-65
Serdarusic N.
Haase R.[14]
6-46-3
Fratangelo B.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-1
Santillan A.
Ficovich J.[16]
6-06-1
Krueger M.[6]
Skatov T.
6-16-0
Simon G.[1]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-06-2
Huesler M.[9]
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[13]
Guinard M.
2-66-36-4
Coppejans K.[11]
Cachin P.
6-797-636-3
Kuhn N.
Kolar Z.[3]
6-36-4
R64
Santillan A.
Rosol L.
7-56-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Kamke T.
7-626-2
Guinard M.
Schoolkate T.
7-627-63
Walkin B.
Bourchier H.
3-66-46-4
Sweeny D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Sachko V.
Fitzgerald P.
6-16-4
Cachin P.
Charlton J.
6-26-2
Stricker D.
Sharan D.
6-46-2
Ellis B.
Puttergill C.
6-12-66-3
Kuhn N.
Sekulic P.
6-756-27-64
Serdarusic N.
Statham J.
3-66-36-2
Soeda G.
Gulbis E.
3-66-37-5
Skatov T.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Mayot H.
Hough D.
6-16-2
Watanuki Y.
Jin J.
6-37-61
Ignatik U.
Moriya H.
6-16-3