Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Mariano Navone — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG7
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#110ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
clay
Mariano Navone
ARG
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Diaz Acosta F.
6-3 6-2
Navone M.
Diaz Acosta F.
662
Navone M.
320

Facundo Diaz Acosta defeated Mariano Navone 6-3 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48, defending last year's round of 16, but Facundo Diaz Acosta had been the form player, winning 7 of their last 8 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Navone M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Diaz Acosta F.Navone M.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Navone M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Navone M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
75
Break points saved·Even
89
86
Break points won·Dominant
33
90
Deciding sets·Slight edge
67
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Navone M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
2.8Clay Elo 1668
Surface ELO
7.2+132 Clay Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Navone M.
Freshness·Dominant
53
96

Diaz Acosta F.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Comesana F.[3]
Navone M.
6-46-0
Cerundolo J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
6-42-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Lama G.[4]
6-16-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Varillas J.[2]
3-66-16-0
Navone M.
Jaziri M.[7]
7-56-0
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
6-36-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Popko D.
6-26-1
Cerundolo J.
Navone M.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Casanova H.[5]
7-56-4
Lama G.[4]
Pereira J.
6-716-16-4
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-36-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[2]
Comesana F.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
1-66-26-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Villanueva G.[4]
6-21-66-3
Comesana F.[3]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Ficovich J.[1]
3-66-06-3
Popko D.
Burruchaga R.
7-50-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Olivo R.
6-34-66-2
Navone M.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-46-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Paz J.
7-57-65
Casanova H.[5]
Rubin N.
6-32-66-2
Pereira J.
Gomez F.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Navone M.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
6-04-67-64
Dellien Velasco M.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-16-1
Lama G.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-36-3
Villanueva G.
Olivieri G.[3]
6-46-1
Comesana F.
Darderi L.
7-656-4
Villanueva G.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-16-3
Collarini A.
Olivo R.[4]
4-66-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
Domingues J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-56-4
Olivieri G.
Bagnis F.[1]
7-646-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.[5]
4-66-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-41-66-4
Navone M.
Hardt N.[6]
6-14-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Juarez F.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-2
Villanueva G.[4]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[3]
Otegui J.
7-56-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Galarza J.
7-687-66
Olivo R.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
W/O
Burruchaga R.
Altmaier D.[2]
7-667-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Otegui J.
6-20-66-4
Navone M.
Sanchez Jover C.
4-66-36-1
Bagnis F.[5]
Torres J.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Leite W.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Darderi L.
7-56-3
R32
Navone M.
Kestelboim M.
7-55-3
Gomez F.
Vidal Azorin J.
3-67-627-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-3
Rubin N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-2
Casanova H.[5]
Juarez F.
6-46-1
Lama G.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-64
Torres J.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-45-76-2
Lipovsek Puches T.
Aboian V.
6-27-63
Dellien Velasco M.
Andreozzi G.[1]
6-36-2
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-41-66-3
Paz J.
Aboian L.
6-37-5
Burruchaga R.
La Serna J.
6-17-65
Villanueva G.
Deckers A.
7-626-4
Pereira J.
Darderi L.[8]
6-47-63
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Torres J.
7-617-5
Varillas J.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Kicker N.[6]
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Juarez F.
6-26-4
Burruchaga R.
Egea F.
6-26-1
Collarini A.
Lama G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.[4]
Janvier M.
7-676-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
De La Fuente S.
7-606-4
Domingues J.
Galarza J.
6-46-736-2
Olivieri G.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-34-66-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
2-66-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Cukierman D.
6-33-66-1
Villanueva G.
Menezes J.[8]
3-66-46-3
Comesana F.
Rodriguez C.
7-677-61
Lingua Lavallen A.
Heide G.
7-677-63
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-66
Franco Descotte M.
Perchicot M.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[5]
Monzon I.
6-16-4
Comesana F.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-26-746-3
Otegui J.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-13-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Mejia N.
6-06-1
Jaziri M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-40-67-5
Andreozzi G.
Zhu E.
6-17-5
Juarez F.
Farjat T.
6-06-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-756-47-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrena A.
6-31-66-4
Navone M.
Aboian V.
6-43-66-3
Villanueva G.[4]
Aboian L.
6-41-66-1
Hardt N.[6]
Tenti F.
6-16-1
Galarza J.
Leite W.
7-626-3
Cerundolo J.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Casanova H.
Collarini A.
6-45-76-3
Leite W.
Midon L.
4-66-36-1
Popko D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-680-67-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-35-76-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-26-4
Sanchez Jover C.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Nagal S.
5-77-647-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-2
Otegui J.
Monzon I.
5-76-47-64
Altmaier D.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-3
Burruchaga R.
Juarez F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[5]
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-26-4
Torres J.
Olivieri G.
7-613-66-3
Darderi L.
Coria F.[1]
6-27-64