Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Johan Nikles — Rio De Janeiro CH Round of 16

Rio De Janeiro CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA1
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 December 2021
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Seyboth Wild T.
6-1 3-6 7-5
Nikles J.
Seyboth Wild T.
6372
Nikles J.
1651

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Johan Nikles 6-1 3-6 7-5 in the Rio De Janeiro CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Thiago Seyboth Wild came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
7
Break points saved·Dominant
93
22
Break points won·Slight edge
25
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
20
29
Tiebreaks·
16
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seyboth Wild T.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Nikles J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+210 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1306
7.4Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1319
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
5.1
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Nikles J.
Freshness·
90
—

Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Uchida K.[8]
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-37-63
Semi-finals
Uchida K.[8]
Decamps G.
6-26-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Kicker N.[2]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Uchida K.[8]
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
6-46-1
Alvarez Varona N.
Smith R.
6-46-4
Decamps G.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-44-66-2
Kicker N.[2]
Alves M.
3-67-646-4
R16
Kicker N.[2]
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
6-46-1
Decamps G.
Gomez Gb42 A.
3-66-46-1
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Nikles J.
6-13-67-5
Uchida K.[8]
Olivieri G.
3-66-36-1
Alves M.
Bobrov B.
7-643-66-3
Smith R.
Sakamoto P.
6-786-46-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Darderi L.
6-36-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Matos R.
6-30-0
R32
Decamps G.
Barrientos N.
6-16-4
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
Pereira J.
6-25-76-4
Sakamoto P.
Juarez F.
6-44-66-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-34-66-3
Darderi L.
Krstin P.[7]
6-27-66
Gomez Gb42 A.
Ficovich J.[3]
4-66-16-2
Olivieri G.
Clezar G.
5-76-46-3
Nikles J.
Castelnuovo L.
6-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Esquici L.
6-26-0
Smith R.
Zeballos F.
6-47-64
Matos R.
Leite W.
6-40-66-2
Kicker N.[2]
Gonzalez A.
7-56-3
Dutra Da Silva D.
Luz O.[6]
7-666-4
Uchida K.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Alves M.
Franco Descotte M.
7-636-4
Bobrov B.
Cid R.[5]
6-31-0