Michail Pervolarakis vs Luca Potenza — Forli 3 CH Round of 32
Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
1.6
Surface form3.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d8.5
7.0
3-set count7.0
Prev. match9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Pervolarakis M.
662
Potenza L.
340
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form53%1st serve in+7%60%
68%1st serve points won+1%67%
45%2nd serve points won+6%51%
57%Service points won+4%61%
31%Return points won+8%39%
46%Break points saved+9%55%
2.1Aces / match+13.1
3.7Double faults / match+1.12.6
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (12 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-06-4
Kotov P.
Basic M.[5]
6-26-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[6]
Cressy M.[1]
7-647-62
R16
Nardi L.
Vatutin A.
7-666-4
Sachko V.[6]
Capecchi D.
6-746-16-2
Setkic A.
Viola M.
6-16-3
Basic M.[5]
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.
Smith K.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[1]
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Pervolarakis M.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-24-1
Capecchi D.
Lock B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Gengel M.
6-23-66-2
Baldi F.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-3
Viola M.
Rosol L.
7-614-67-5
Smith K.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Nardi L.
Vavassori A.[7]
6-46-2
Vatutin A.
Copil M.
6-746-36-3
Setkic A.
Gaio F.[2]
7-56-2
Sachko V.[6]
Erler A.
3-66-26-2
Miedler L.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-3
Kotov P.
Bergs Z.[4]
7-56-757-5
Cressy M.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-26-3
Basic M.[5]
Danilov S.
6-36-4
Pervolarakis M.
Potenza L.
6-36-4