Cem Ilkel vs Ivan Nedelko — Antalya 4 CH Round of 32

Antalya 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR1
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
clay
RUS
Ivan Nedelko
#916ATP
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Ilkel C.
6-4 7-5
Nedelko I.
Ilkel C.
672
Nedelko I.
450

Cem Ilkel defeated Ivan Nedelko 6-4 7-5 in the Antalya 4 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nedelko I.

Nedelko I.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Nedelko I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Nedelko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
2
Break points saved·Dominant
49
18
Break points won·Dominant
3
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nedelko I.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tiurnev E.[9]
Prihodko O.
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Prihodko O.
Fonio G.
1-66-16-3
Tiurnev E.[9]
Fatic N.[7]
6-25-74-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[7]
Ajdukovic D.[3]
6-47-5
Fonio G.
Hardt N.
7-606-2
Prihodko O.
Ilkel C.[1]
6-33-66-2
Tiurnev E.[9]
Lazarov A.
6-46-756-1
R16
Fatic N.[7]
Orlov V.
W/O
Tiurnev E.[9]
Jecan M.
6-34-66-3
Lazarov A.
Chepelev A.
6-26-0
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Cretu C.
4-66-46-4
Fonio G.
Peniston R.[4]
1-66-46-4
Prihodko O.
Lee D.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Jianu F.
6-736-46-0
Hardt N.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
5-76-06-2
R32
Tiurnev E.[9]
Wenger D.
6-26-3
Jecan M.
Chappell N.
6-27-62
Lazarov A.
Ilhan M.
6-36-3
Chepelev A.
Lomakin G.
7-56-4
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-41-66-4
Cretu C.
Sultanov K.
6-36-3
Orlov V.
Kravchenko G.
6-46-1
Fatic N.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
2-66-06-0
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
Misolic F.
6-36-3
Hardt N.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Fonio G.
Paul J.
6-16-0
Prihodko O.
Bonadio R.[5]
7-6156-4
Lee D.
Marozsan F.
6-46-1
Jianu F.
Agabigun S.
6-07-5
Ilkel C.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-47-5
Peniston R.[4]
Hsu Y.
7-607-60