Matteo Gigante vs Marek Gengel — Forli 3 CH Round of 32

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Gigante M.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Gengel M.
Gigante M.
6362
Gengel M.
2621

Matteo Gigante defeated Marek Gengel 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Forli 3 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Gigante closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
11
Break points saved·Dominant
78
35
Break points won·Dominant
35
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gengel M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+156 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1377
7.3Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1411
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Nardi L.
4-66-36-4
Kotov P.
Sachko V.[6]
6-44-0
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Basic M.[5]
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-06-4
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[6]
Cressy M.[1]
7-647-62
R16
Sachko V.[6]
Capecchi D.
6-746-16-2
Nardi L.
Vatutin A.
7-666-4
Pervolarakis M.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Basic M.[5]
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[1]
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Setkic A.
Viola M.
6-16-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.
Smith K.
7-56-2
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-24-1
Kotov P.
Bergs Z.[4]
7-56-757-5
Setkic A.
Gaio F.[2]
7-56-2
Vatutin A.
Copil M.
6-746-36-3
Nardi L.
Vavassori A.[7]
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-3
Pervolarakis M.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-26-3
Miedler L.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-3
Smith K.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[6]
Erler A.
3-66-26-2
Capecchi D.
Lock B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Gengel M.
6-23-66-2
Viola M.
Rosol L.
7-614-67-5
Cressy M.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Basic M.[5]
Danilov S.
6-36-4