Aldin Setkic vs Federico Gaio — Forli 3 CH Round of 32

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Aldin Setkic
#1327ATP
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
hard
ITA2
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Setkic A.
7-5 6-2
Gaio F.
Setkic A.
762
Gaio F.
520

Aldin Setkic defeated Federico Gaio 7-5 6-2 in the Forli 3 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Aldin Setkic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Aldin Setkic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Aldin Setkic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-18Australian OpenQ1hardAldin Setkic6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Setkic A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Setkic A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Setkic A.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Setkic A.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
54
76
Break points won·Slight edge
8
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
40
Tiebreaks·Even
9
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Setkic A.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gaio F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.7
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Nardi L.
4-66-36-4
Kotov P.
Sachko V.[6]
6-44-0
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Basic M.[5]
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-06-4
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[6]
Cressy M.[1]
7-647-62
R16
Sachko V.[6]
Capecchi D.
6-746-16-2
Nardi L.
Vatutin A.
7-666-4
Pervolarakis M.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Basic M.[5]
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[1]
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Setkic A.
Viola M.
6-16-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.
Smith K.
7-56-2
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-24-1
Kotov P.
Bergs Z.[4]
7-56-757-5
Setkic A.
Gaio F.[2]
7-56-2
Vatutin A.
Copil M.
6-746-36-3
Nardi L.
Vavassori A.[7]
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-3
Pervolarakis M.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-26-3
Miedler L.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-3
Smith K.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[6]
Erler A.
3-66-26-2
Capecchi D.
Lock B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Gengel M.
6-23-66-2
Viola M.
Rosol L.
7-614-67-5
Cressy M.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Basic M.[5]
Danilov S.
6-36-4