Giovanni Fonio vs Jakub Paul — Antalya 4 CH Round of 32

Antalya 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1319Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
clay
SUI
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1348Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Fonio G.
6-1 6-0
Paul J.
Fonio G.
662
Paul J.
100

Giovanni Fonio defeated Jakub Paul 6-1 6-0 in the Antalya 4 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fonio G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fonio G.Paul J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fonio G.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
6
21
Break points saved·Even
63
62
Break points won·Slight edge
12
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fonio G.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Paul J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Clay Elo 1319
Surface ELO
5.4+28 Clay Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1349
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1389
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tiurnev E.[9]
Prihodko O.
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Prihodko O.
Fonio G.
1-66-16-3
Tiurnev E.[9]
Fatic N.[7]
6-25-74-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[7]
Ajdukovic D.[3]
6-47-5
Fonio G.
Hardt N.
7-606-2
Prihodko O.
Ilkel C.[1]
6-33-66-2
Tiurnev E.[9]
Lazarov A.
6-46-756-1
R16
Fatic N.[7]
Orlov V.
W/O
Tiurnev E.[9]
Jecan M.
6-34-66-3
Lazarov A.
Chepelev A.
6-26-0
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Cretu C.
4-66-46-4
Fonio G.
Peniston R.[4]
1-66-46-4
Prihodko O.
Lee D.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Jianu F.
6-736-46-0
Hardt N.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
5-76-06-2
R32
Tiurnev E.[9]
Wenger D.
6-26-3
Jecan M.
Chappell N.
6-27-62
Lazarov A.
Ilhan M.
6-36-3
Chepelev A.
Lomakin G.
7-56-4
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-41-66-4
Cretu C.
Sultanov K.
6-36-3
Orlov V.
Kravchenko G.
6-46-1
Fatic N.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
2-66-06-0
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
Misolic F.
6-36-3
Hardt N.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Fonio G.
Paul J.
6-16-0
Prihodko O.
Bonadio R.[5]
7-6156-4
Lee D.
Marozsan F.
6-46-1
Jianu F.
Agabigun S.
6-07-5
Ilkel C.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-47-5
Peniston R.[4]
Hsu Y.
7-607-60