Maxime Cressy vs Matteo Gigante — Forli 3 CH Round of 16

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA1
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
hard
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Cressy M.
7-6 6-2
Gigante M.
Cressy M.
7762
Gigante M.
6320

Maxime Cressy defeated Matteo Gigante 7-6 6-2 in the Forli 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
78
Break points won·Dominant
2
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gigante M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
1.7
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Nardi L.
4-66-36-4
Kotov P.
Sachko V.[6]
6-44-0
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Basic M.[5]
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-06-4
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[6]
Cressy M.[1]
7-647-62
R16
Sachko V.[6]
Capecchi D.
6-746-16-2
Nardi L.
Vatutin A.
7-666-4
Pervolarakis M.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Basic M.[5]
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[1]
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Setkic A.
Viola M.
6-16-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.
Smith K.
7-56-2
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-24-1
Kotov P.
Bergs Z.[4]
7-56-757-5
Setkic A.
Gaio F.[2]
7-56-2
Vatutin A.
Copil M.
6-746-36-3
Nardi L.
Vavassori A.[7]
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-3
Pervolarakis M.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-26-3
Miedler L.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-3
Smith K.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[6]
Erler A.
3-66-26-2
Capecchi D.
Lock B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Gengel M.
6-23-66-2
Viola M.
Rosol L.
7-614-67-5
Cressy M.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Basic M.[5]
Danilov S.
6-36-4