Javier Barranco Cosano vs Filip Misolic — Antalya 4 CH Round of 32

Antalya 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP6
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Barranco Cosano J.
6-3 6-3
Misolic F.
Barranco Cosano J.
662
Misolic F.
330

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Filip Misolic 6-3 6-3 in the Antalya 4 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
79
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
91
Break points won·Clear edge
33
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Misolic F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.8+223 Clay Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1587
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
6.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tiurnev E.[9]
Prihodko O.
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Prihodko O.
Fonio G.
1-66-16-3
Tiurnev E.[9]
Fatic N.[7]
6-25-74-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[7]
Ajdukovic D.[3]
6-47-5
Fonio G.
Hardt N.
7-606-2
Prihodko O.
Ilkel C.[1]
6-33-66-2
Tiurnev E.[9]
Lazarov A.
6-46-756-1
R16
Fatic N.[7]
Orlov V.
W/O
Tiurnev E.[9]
Jecan M.
6-34-66-3
Lazarov A.
Chepelev A.
6-26-0
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Cretu C.
4-66-46-4
Fonio G.
Peniston R.[4]
1-66-46-4
Prihodko O.
Lee D.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Jianu F.
6-736-46-0
Hardt N.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
5-76-06-2
R32
Tiurnev E.[9]
Wenger D.
6-26-3
Jecan M.
Chappell N.
6-27-62
Lazarov A.
Ilhan M.
6-36-3
Chepelev A.
Lomakin G.
7-56-4
Ajdukovic D.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-41-66-4
Cretu C.
Sultanov K.
6-36-3
Orlov V.
Kravchenko G.
6-46-1
Fatic N.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
2-66-06-0
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
Misolic F.
6-36-3
Hardt N.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Fonio G.
Paul J.
6-16-0
Prihodko O.
Bonadio R.[5]
7-6156-4
Lee D.
Marozsan F.
6-46-1
Jianu F.
Agabigun S.
6-07-5
Ilkel C.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-47-5
Peniston R.[4]
Hsu Y.
7-607-60