Kimmer Coppejans vs Paul Jubb — Maia 1 CH Round of 32

Maia 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL2
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
clay
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1338Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Coppejans K.
6-1 6-1
Jubb P.
Coppejans K.
662
Jubb P.
110

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Paul Jubb 6-1 6-1 in the Maia 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
44
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
84
Break points won·Clear edge
29
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
2.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 889 days (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.1+175 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1338
6.4Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
100

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Tseng C.[6]
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Borges N.[5]
7-636-0
Tseng C.[6]
Martin A.[1]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Elias G.[3]
W/O
Tseng C.[6]
Hemery C.
6-46-1
Martin A.[1]
Wessels L.
6-25-76-4
Borges N.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-47-64
R16
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Oliveira G.
2-66-36-4
Coppejans K.[2]
Damas M.
6-26-1
Elias G.[3]
Cacao T.
6-22-66-3
Wessels L.
Roca Batalla O.
3-66-26-2
Martin A.[1]
Benchetrit E.
6-27-60
Hemery C.
Domingues J.[4]
6-36-756-3
Tseng C.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-4
Borges N.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-56-1
R32
Borges N.[5]
Ejupovic E.
1-66-36-4
Cacao T.
Pichler D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Roncalli S.
7-53-66-3
Oliveira G.
Hamou M.
6-26-2
Hemery C.
Araujo P.
6-36-1
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-33-66-2
Dougaz A.
Gakhov I.
6-16-4
Domingues J.[4]
Perchicot M.
2-67-626-1
Elias G.[3]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-46-2
Tseng C.[6]
Moraing O.
6-46-1
Coppejans K.[2]
Jubb P.
6-16-1
Benchetrit E.
Bocchi L.
6-40-67-63
Ionel N.
Vale D.
6-716-36-2
Roca Batalla O.
Diez S.[7]
6-46-1
Damas M.
Cagnina J.
0-67-656-4
Martin A.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-0