Daniele Capecchi vs Benjamin Lock — Forli 3 CH Round of 32

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Daniele Capecchi
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
hard
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Capecchi D.
6-3 6-1
Lock B.
Capecchi D.
662
Lock B.
310

Daniele Capecchi defeated Benjamin Lock 6-3 6-1 in the Forli 3 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Capecchi D.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Lock B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Capecchi D.

Serve advantage — Lock B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Capecchi D.Lock B.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
59%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
40%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Capecchi D.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 259 days (−1.5)
Lock B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Nardi L.
4-66-36-4
Kotov P.
Sachko V.[6]
6-44-0
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Basic M.[5]
6-26-3
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-06-4
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[6]
Cressy M.[1]
7-647-62
R16
Sachko V.[6]
Capecchi D.
6-746-16-2
Nardi L.
Vatutin A.
7-666-4
Pervolarakis M.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Basic M.[5]
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[1]
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Setkic A.
Viola M.
6-16-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.
Smith K.
7-56-2
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-24-1
Kotov P.
Bergs Z.[4]
7-56-757-5
Setkic A.
Gaio F.[2]
7-56-2
Vatutin A.
Copil M.
6-746-36-3
Nardi L.
Vavassori A.[7]
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-3
Pervolarakis M.
Potenza L.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-26-3
Miedler L.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-3
Smith K.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[6]
Erler A.
3-66-26-2
Capecchi D.
Lock B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Gengel M.
6-23-66-2
Viola M.
Rosol L.
7-614-67-5
Cressy M.[1]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Basic M.[5]
Danilov S.
6-36-4