Tiago Cacao vs David Pichler — Maia 1 CH Round of 32

Maia 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
POR
Tiago Cacao
#820ATP
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 December 2021
clay
AUT
David Pichler
#1053ATP
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLWL
Cacao T.
2-6 6-1 6-4
Pichler D.
Cacao T.
2662
Pichler D.
6141

Tiago Cacao defeated David Pichler 2-6 6-1 6-4 in the Maia 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cacao T.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pichler D.

Pichler D.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cacao T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cacao T.Pichler D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
52%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (31 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cacao T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pichler D.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
2.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Tseng C.[6]
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Borges N.[5]
7-636-0
Tseng C.[6]
Martin A.[1]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Elias G.[3]
W/O
Tseng C.[6]
Hemery C.
6-46-1
Martin A.[1]
Wessels L.
6-25-76-4
Borges N.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-47-64
R16
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Oliveira G.
2-66-36-4
Coppejans K.[2]
Damas M.
6-26-1
Elias G.[3]
Cacao T.
6-22-66-3
Wessels L.
Roca Batalla O.
3-66-26-2
Martin A.[1]
Benchetrit E.
6-27-60
Hemery C.
Domingues J.[4]
6-36-756-3
Tseng C.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-4
Borges N.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-56-1
R32
Borges N.[5]
Ejupovic E.
1-66-36-4
Cacao T.
Pichler D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Roncalli S.
7-53-66-3
Oliveira G.
Hamou M.
6-26-2
Hemery C.
Araujo P.
6-36-1
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-33-66-2
Dougaz A.
Gakhov I.
6-16-4
Domingues J.[4]
Perchicot M.
2-67-626-1
Elias G.[3]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-46-2
Tseng C.[6]
Moraing O.
6-46-1
Coppejans K.[2]
Jubb P.
6-16-1
Benchetrit E.
Bocchi L.
6-40-67-63
Ionel N.
Vale D.
6-716-36-2
Roca Batalla O.
Diez S.[7]
6-46-1
Damas M.
Cagnina J.
0-67-656-4
Martin A.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-0