Lukas Rosol vs Aldin Setkic — Forli 2 CH Round of 32

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
hard
BIH
Aldin Setkic
#1327ATP
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Rosol L.
6-3 6-4
Setkic A.
Rosol L.
662
Setkic A.
340

Lukas Rosol defeated Aldin Setkic 6-3 6-4 in the Forli 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Setkic A.

Setkic A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Setkic A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Setkic A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
0
Break points saved·Dominant
89
54
Break points won·Slight edge
3
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Setkic A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cressy M.[2]
Bachinger M.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Sels J.
6-27-5
Bachinger M.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[4]
Cobolli F.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
7-647-5
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-36-4
Cressy M.[2]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
R16
Cressy M.[2]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Albot R.[3]
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Stricker D.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Miedler L.
2-66-06-2
Cobolli F.
Kotov P.
6-737-667-67
Bachinger M.
Otte O.[1]
6-23-1
R32
Vatutin A.
Fabbiano T.[8]
7-667-61
Cobolli F.
Arnaboldi A.
1-66-36-4
Cressy M.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-2
Viola M.
Maden Y.
1-66-46-4
Stricker D.
Kamke T.
6-47-65
Lenz J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-06-3
Albot R.[3]
Vavassori A.
6-726-47-62
Sels J.
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Kotov P.
Masur D.[7]
7-56-4
Rosol L.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Forejtek J.
7-645-76-3
Bachinger M.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Miedler L.
Basic M.
7-646-4
Sachko V.
Nardi L.
6-45-76-4
Otte O.[1]
Forti F.
6-37-5
Celikbilek A.[6]
Brancaccio R.
7-56-2