Eduard Esteve Lobato vs Filip Misolic — Antalya 3 CH Round of 16

Antalya 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP
Eduard Esteve Lobato
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Esteve Lobato E.
6-2 6-3
Misolic F.
Esteve Lobato E.
662
Misolic F.
230

Eduard Esteve Lobato defeated Filip Misolic 6-2 6-3 in the Antalya 3 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Esteve Lobato E.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Esteve Lobato E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Esteve Lobato E.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Esteve Lobato E.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Misolic F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Peniston R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-62
Borges N.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Esteve Lobato E.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-26-0
Borges N.[6]
Hardt N.
6-26-4
Peniston R.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-25-77-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Jianu F.
6-14-66-4
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Misolic F.
6-26-3
Borges N.[6]
Erel Y.
6-46-0
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
2-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Cacao T.
6-26-1
Jianu F.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-756-46-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Ilkel C.[1]
7-636-3
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[3]
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.[2]
Crawford O.
7-56-4
R32
Svrcina D.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-40-0
Hardt N.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Lee D.
6-26-3
Misolic F.
Tseng C.[5]
6-25-77-67
Peniston R.
Fatic N.
2-66-16-3
Cacao T.
Metreveli A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Zekic M.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Borges N.[6]
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
7-646-4
Domingues J.[3]
Bonadio R.
7-644-66-1
Jianu F.
Veldheer M.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Chappell N.
6-45-77-5
Erel Y.
Tiurnev E.
7-655-73-3