Ryan Peniston vs Nerman Fatic — Antalya 3 CH Round of 32

Antalya 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1357Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Peniston R.
2-6 6-1 6-3
Fatic N.
Peniston R.
2662
Fatic N.
6131

Ryan Peniston defeated Nerman Fatic 2-6 6-1 6-3 in the Antalya 3 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Even
20
24
Break points saved·Even
60
63
Break points won·Slight edge
25
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1357
Surface ELO
6.6+122 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
5.5
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Peniston R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-62
Borges N.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Esteve Lobato E.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-26-0
Borges N.[6]
Hardt N.
6-26-4
Peniston R.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-25-77-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Jianu F.
6-14-66-4
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Misolic F.
6-26-3
Borges N.[6]
Erel Y.
6-46-0
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
2-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Cacao T.
6-26-1
Jianu F.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-756-46-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Ilkel C.[1]
7-636-3
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[3]
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.[2]
Crawford O.
7-56-4
R32
Svrcina D.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-40-0
Hardt N.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Lee D.
6-26-3
Misolic F.
Tseng C.[5]
6-25-77-67
Peniston R.
Fatic N.
2-66-16-3
Cacao T.
Metreveli A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Zekic M.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Borges N.[6]
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
7-646-4
Domingues J.[3]
Bonadio R.
7-644-66-1
Jianu F.
Veldheer M.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Chappell N.
6-45-77-5
Erel Y.
Tiurnev E.
7-655-73-3