Maxime Cressy vs Evgeny Karlovskiy — Forli 2 CH Round of 32

Forli 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA2
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
hard
RUS
Evgeny Karlovskiy
#1219ATP
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
Cressy M.
6-3 6-2
Karlovskiy E.
Cressy M.
662
Karlovskiy E.
320

Maxime Cressy defeated Evgeny Karlovskiy 6-3 6-2 in the Forli 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Karlovskiy E.

Karlovskiy E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Karlovskiy E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Karlovskiy E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
0
Break points saved·Dominant
96
55
Break points won·Even
2
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
7
Tiebreaks·Even
8
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Karlovskiy E.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.6
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
5.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cressy M.[2]
Bachinger M.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Sels J.
6-27-5
Bachinger M.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[4]
Cobolli F.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
7-647-5
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-36-4
Cressy M.[2]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
R16
Cressy M.[2]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Albot R.[3]
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Stricker D.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Miedler L.
2-66-06-2
Cobolli F.
Kotov P.
6-737-667-67
Bachinger M.
Otte O.[1]
6-23-1
R32
Vatutin A.
Fabbiano T.[8]
7-667-61
Cobolli F.
Arnaboldi A.
1-66-36-4
Cressy M.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-2
Viola M.
Maden Y.
1-66-46-4
Stricker D.
Kamke T.
6-47-65
Lenz J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-06-3
Albot R.[3]
Vavassori A.
6-726-47-62
Sels J.
Gigante M.
7-636-2
Kotov P.
Masur D.[7]
7-56-4
Rosol L.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Forejtek J.
7-645-76-3
Bachinger M.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Miedler L.
Basic M.
7-646-4
Sachko V.
Nardi L.
6-45-76-4
Otte O.[1]
Forti F.
6-37-5
Celikbilek A.[6]
Brancaccio R.
7-56-2