Ryan Peniston vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Antalya 3 CH Semi-final

Antalya 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1357Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Peniston R.
6-4 7-6
Barranco Cosano J.
Peniston R.
6772
Barranco Cosano J.
4620

Ryan Peniston defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-4 7-6 in the Antalya 3 CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
20
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
70
Break points won·Slight edge
25
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
15
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Barranco Cosano J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1357
Surface ELO
6.1+85 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1457
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Peniston R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-62
Borges N.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Esteve Lobato E.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-26-0
Borges N.[6]
Hardt N.
6-26-4
Peniston R.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-25-77-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Jianu F.
6-14-66-4
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Misolic F.
6-26-3
Borges N.[6]
Erel Y.
6-46-0
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
2-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Cacao T.
6-26-1
Jianu F.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-756-46-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Ilkel C.[1]
7-636-3
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[3]
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.[2]
Crawford O.
7-56-4
R32
Svrcina D.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-40-0
Hardt N.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Lee D.
6-26-3
Misolic F.
Tseng C.[5]
6-25-77-67
Peniston R.
Fatic N.
2-66-16-3
Cacao T.
Metreveli A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Zekic M.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Borges N.[6]
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
7-646-4
Domingues J.[3]
Bonadio R.
7-644-66-1
Jianu F.
Veldheer M.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Chappell N.
6-45-77-5
Erel Y.
Tiurnev E.
7-655-73-3