Javier Barranco Cosano vs Filip Cristian Jianu — Antalya 3 CH Quarter-final

Antalya 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
clay
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1362Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Barranco Cosano J.
6-1 4-6 6-4
Jianu F.
Barranco Cosano J.
6462
Jianu F.
1641

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Filip Cristian Jianu 6-1 4-6 6-4 in the Antalya 3 CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Jianu F.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Jianu F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Jianu F.
Clutch Rating·Even
14
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
55
Break points won·Clear edge
33
52
Deciding sets·Slight edge
5
13
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
7
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Jianu F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+79 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1362
5.4Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Peniston R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-62
Borges N.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Esteve Lobato E.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-26-0
Borges N.[6]
Hardt N.
6-26-4
Peniston R.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-25-77-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Jianu F.
6-14-66-4
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Misolic F.
6-26-3
Borges N.[6]
Erel Y.
6-46-0
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
2-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Cacao T.
6-26-1
Jianu F.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-756-46-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Ilkel C.[1]
7-636-3
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[3]
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.[2]
Crawford O.
7-56-4
R32
Svrcina D.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-40-0
Hardt N.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Lee D.
6-26-3
Misolic F.
Tseng C.[5]
6-25-77-67
Peniston R.
Fatic N.
2-66-16-3
Cacao T.
Metreveli A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Zekic M.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Borges N.[6]
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
7-646-4
Domingues J.[3]
Bonadio R.
7-644-66-1
Jianu F.
Veldheer M.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Chappell N.
6-45-77-5
Erel Y.
Tiurnev E.
7-655-73-3