Joao Domingues vs Riccardo Bonadio — Antalya 3 CH Round of 32

Antalya 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Joao Domingues
POR3
Joao Domingues
#591ATP
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 November 2021
clay
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Domingues J.
7-6 4-6 6-1
Bonadio R.
Domingues J.
77462
Bonadio R.
64611

Joao Domingues defeated Riccardo Bonadio 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Antalya 3 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Joao Domingues came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Domingues J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Bonadio R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Domingues J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Domingues J.Bonadio R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
57%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Domingues J.Bonadio R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
26
Break points saved·Dominant
23
70
Break points won·Even
16
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
44
Tiebreaks·Even
16
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Domingues J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Bonadio R.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Peniston R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-62
Borges N.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Esteve Lobato E.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-26-0
Borges N.[6]
Hardt N.
6-26-4
Peniston R.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-25-77-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Jianu F.
6-14-66-4
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Misolic F.
6-26-3
Borges N.[6]
Erel Y.
6-46-0
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
2-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Cacao T.
6-26-1
Jianu F.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-756-46-0
Barranco Cosano J.
Ilkel C.[1]
7-636-3
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[3]
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.[2]
Crawford O.
7-56-4
R32
Svrcina D.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-40-0
Hardt N.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Lee D.
6-26-3
Misolic F.
Tseng C.[5]
6-25-77-67
Peniston R.
Fatic N.
2-66-16-3
Cacao T.
Metreveli A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.[7]
Zekic M.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Borges N.[6]
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
7-646-4
Domingues J.[3]
Bonadio R.
7-644-66-1
Jianu F.
Veldheer M.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Chappell N.
6-45-77-5
Erel Y.
Tiurnev E.
7-655-73-3