Tobias Kamke vs Federico Gaio — Bari CH Round of 32

Bari CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 November 2021
hard
ITA6
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Kamke T.
6-3 6-4
Gaio F.
Kamke T.
662
Gaio F.
340

Tobias Kamke defeated Federico Gaio 6-3 6-4 in the Bari CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tobias Kamke came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tobias Kamke extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tobias Kamke closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ1hardTobias Kamke6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kamke T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kamke T.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kamke T.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
14
20
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
76
Break points won·Clear edge
22
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
40
Tiebreaks·Even
7
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kamke T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gaio F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[3]
Masur D.[8]
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Otte O.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-46-4
Masur D.[8]
Vavassori A.
7-53-67-65
Quarter-finals
Fabbiano T.
Brancaccio R.
6-25-76-2
Vavassori A.
Baldi F.
3-63-1
Masur D.[8]
Nardi L.
7-656-766-4
Otte O.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-36-3
R16
Brancaccio R.
Taberner C.[1]
7-666-3
Vavassori A.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-6106-2
Nardi L.
Lenz J.
6-36-2
Masur D.[8]
Forti F.
6-777-616-3
Otte O.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-36-737-5
Fabbiano T.
Draper J.
6-46-3
Cobolli F.
Kamke T.
7-6102-66-1
Baldi F.
Arnaboldi A.
6-43-66-3
R32
Kamke T.
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-4
Baldi F.
Kotov P.
6-06-4
Vavassori A.
Milojevic N.[5]
6-17-5
Lenz J.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-55-76-4
Forti F.
Maestrelli F.
6-44-66-3
Cobolli F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
3-66-26-0
Fanselow S.
Stricker D.
4-66-47-5
Otte O.[3]
Ovcharenko O.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Marcora R.[7]
7-686-3
Brancaccio R.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Taberner C.[1]
Bellier A.
6-26-2
Pellegrino A.
Bachinger M.
4-66-46-4
Nardi L.
Cressy M.[4]
6-46-1
Draper J.
Maden Y.
7-656-1
Masur D.[8]
Andaloro F.
6-46-4
Arnaboldi A.
Rune H.[2]
6-41-0